The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta, of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C. Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites. In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avans, The Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a majkor city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion. In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists. Evidence ,it would Useful to determine which of the following ? 1A) whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities 2B) Whether significant numbers of artifacts that do not resemble artifacts produced in Ashkelon have been found at Avaris 3C) Whether Avaris was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan 4D) Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C.continued to produce artifacts similar to whose found at Avaris 5E) whether any artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been found in Egypt 我选A,但也有人说B. 不知道哪个更对?请NN指点 |