ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1343|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全2-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-16 15:16:00 | 只看该作者

大全2-18

18.   问题Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it cannot compete economically with other means of accomplishing the objectives of spaceflight.

Edward: No mode of human transportation has a better record of reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years. Thus manned spaceflight definitely has a positive future.

Which of the following is the best logical evaluation of Edward’s argument as a response to Teresa’s argument?

(A) It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.

(B) It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.

(C) It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.

(D) It does not meet Teresa’s point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.D

(E) It fails to respond to Teresa’s argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.

答案是d

impediment在teresa的point哪里体现了?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-17 14:51:00 | 只看该作者

up

板凳
发表于 2006-10-17 17:10:00 | 只看该作者

impediment是T所说的economically, 没钱

E在那儿胡说八道,说些与T不着边际的话

所以是 dose not meet the point

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-17 18:10:00 | 只看该作者

还是不很能理解

e并没有assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space

只是通过提出Manned spaceflight 非常reliable这一优点来驳斥t的Manned spaceflight没前途的论点呀

请达人赐教

5#
发表于 2006-10-17 18:37:00 | 只看该作者
所以你不觉得E说的是无关么? 和T说的无关 does not meet the point
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-18 00:22:00 | 只看该作者

没有其他更好的选择了

不过还是总觉得不太comfortable

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 01:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部