以下是引用conquergmat在2006-9-10 16:50:00的发言:Q8: The number of applications for teaching positions in Newtown’s public schools was 5.7 percent lower in 1993 than in 1985 and 5.9 percent lower in 1994 than in 1985. Despite a steadily growing student population and an increasing number of teacher resignations, however, Newtown dose not face a teacher shortage in the late 1990’s.
Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy above?
- Many of Newtown’s public school students do not graduate from high school.
- New housing developments planned for Newtown are slated for occupancy in 1997 and are expected to increase the number of elementary school students in Newtown’s public schools by 12 percent.
- The Newtown school board does not contemplate increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990’s.
- Teachers’ colleges in and near Newtown produced fewer graduates in 1994 than in 1993.
- In 1993 Newtown’s public schools received 40 percent more applications for teaching positions than there were positions available.
how to understand choice C? the answer is E
我倾向选E.我的理解是: 原文是想说为啥没有出现老师短缺的现象.C能回答的是老师的人数应该按比例在增加的.可是能否增加,C没说,就是C选项回答不了老师是否短缺. 而E说的申请老师直位的人数要比最后招的人数多很多,这就能说明不会出现老师短缺的现象,因为更多的人想获得这个职位. 个人看法. |