ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1143|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新手提问OG11-VR-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-6 05:07:00 | 只看该作者

新手提问OG11-VR-4

4The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method calledhistorical costing."Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increasebased on the current rate of inflationto the previous year’s contractual price

Which of the following statementsif trueis the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?

(A)  The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds

(B)  The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years

(C)The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products

(D)  Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts

(E)  The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons

og解释C:

Identifying the importance of the cost of materialswhich also varies with inflationis a strength of the method

我实在是不能够理解,既然the cost of materials also varies with inflation,那为什么不可以作为一个不能使用historical costing 的理由?

沙发
发表于 2006-9-6 09:50:00 | 只看该作者
题目指出使用‘historical costing'就是因为有通货膨胀, 所以政府采取这种方式来达到弥补通货的作用,C答案说原材料价格会影响合同价格不就是因为原材料价格会收到通货影响吗,是对题目的加强,OG解释挺有道理的,lz再琢磨一下。我在logic也不是很强,如果说的不对,见谅
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-7 00:48:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢,是我把题目意思理解错了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-2 00:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部