把OG11的解释敲进来,大家再讨论下吧!(我还是没被convince。。。) Situation: An advertisement claims that Novex is the most effective painkiller for sinus pain since three out of four hospitals use it for patients. Reasoning: What point undermines the advertisement's claim? The argument for Novex's effectiveness as a painkiller is based upon the hospitals' usage. Consider what might be driving the hospitals' choice of medications to administer. Three out of four hospitals might be giving their patients Novex not because it is the most effective painkiller for sinus pain, but because it is inexpensive. If this is the case, the argument is seriously undermined. A. Other kinds of pain are irrelevant to the argument since the claim is only about sinus pain. B. This piont does not undermine the advertisement's claim. C. Correct. This statement properly identifies a factor that could well undermine the advertisement's claim: the hospitals may be using this medication because it is the most cost effective for them. D. Novex's nonprescription formula is not relevant to the claim. E. This point strengthens rather than weakens, the claim. D已经明确说处方非处方无关了,看来以前大家有点想太多了。。。 另外B/C之间还是很难定夺。C说了厂家会低价把药卖给医院,但是它用的是many drug manufacturers,并没有具体到Novex。那么既然Novex价格低,其他药的价格也可以降低,并不能看出Novex相对其他药的价格优势。这个证据要是用来证明“医院卖的药比外面药方卖的便宜”还有点用处。 而B,还是我觉得相对最好的答案。它说tolerate the drug the hospitals usually use,我理解为:可能常用的药药性很烈,病人不能忍受,只好换用Novex。(要是理解成,常用的药效果不够,病人还是疼,只好换用Novex,那就是加强了。但是那样的话是不是应该说tolerate the sinus pain?)不过这里的drugs usually used似乎又有点矛盾,毕竟从题干看来,3/4的想表达的意思就是Novex是usually used drug。另外B选项的解释,什么does not undermine,等于没说,让我很不爽! 怎么办?OG的答案是圣旨吗?谁来说服我啊? |