In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities. Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT: (A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry. (B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air. (C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London. (D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.(A) (E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.
答案是a 我觉得a是很有assumption作用的。 前提,因为英国有了air-pollution regulations on industry之后,鸟多了很多. 结论,其他城市也应该采用air-pollution regulations on industry。 assumption,local industry造成了污染。 我想问一下,是不是因为a太绝对了?如果说在一定程度上时local industry造成的,是不是就对了。 是不是有绝对次的选项都不能选呢? |