ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1158|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全-B-2,及这种题型的方法

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-29 22:00:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全-B-2,及这种题型的方法

       In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.

Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.

(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.

(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.

(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.A

(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.

答案是a

我觉得a是很有assumption作用的。

前提,因为英国有了air-pollution regulations on industry之后,鸟多了很多.

结论,其他城市也应该采用air-pollution regulations on industry。

assumption,local industry造成了污染。

我想问一下,是不是因为a太绝对了?如果说在一定程度上时local industry造成的,是不是就对了。

是不是有绝对次的选项都不能选呢?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-8-29 22:09:00 | 只看该作者

不好意思,刚才搜错题号了,所以没有找到。

贴一个lawyer以前的解释——A错在almost entirely 。只要是主要就可以推出结论。

板凳
发表于 2006-8-30 18:27:00 | 只看该作者
that's right:
    "almost entirely", which i want to mention.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-23 01:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部