ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2214|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]TT GWD-4-27???

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-22 15:55:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]TT GWD-4-27???


    

Q27:


    

In parts of the Caribbean, the
manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat.  Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge
of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop
hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees.  Tourist interest is high, so the plan has
promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income
and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.


    

 


    

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious
doubt about the plan’s chance of success?


    

 


    
  1. Many
         tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are
         uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former
         manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.
  2. Recovery
         of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the
         manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.
  3. In
         areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people
         could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods
         obtained from the sea.
  4. There
         would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the
         tourists who want to see manatees.
  5. To
         maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding
         tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into
         the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.

    

  
Answer:E

I choose A, I think A is better than E, even though E is weaken the plan too.
is the E is the right answer?

沙发
发表于 2006-9-22 23:58:00 | 只看该作者
You can not attack“Tourist interest is high” that is mentioned above.
板凳
发表于 2006-9-24 16:30:00 | 只看该作者
还可以这么解释啊!学习了学习了!看完题我和楼主想法一样来着...
地板
发表于 2006-11-9 23:21:00 | 只看该作者

这是什么意思啊, 我怎么还是不懂呢?NN们可以解答一下吗!

5#
发表于 2007-1-25 04:13:00 | 只看该作者
it means the provious hunters have to work harder and it is not easy to earn "good income", right?
6#
发表于 2007-1-29 22:56:00 | 只看该作者
E正确。
因为那个动物的栖息地很FRAGILE,大船还有多次的往返肯定回破坏哪个栖息地,那么那个动物就会没了,同时猎人也没钱赚了。所以最大程度的削弱了结论。
7#
发表于 2007-1-29 23:46:00 | 只看该作者
E...
A没有很好的结合结论的具体性和特殊性。。。
双赢。。。 A 只讲了单方面但是E 且很好地说明了不能"双赢"这个事实..

8#
发表于 2007-6-26 16:29:00 | 只看该作者

a is contradicts the premise

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 12:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部