ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2653|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全-20-7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-17 05:50:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]大全-20-7

        It is better for the environment if as much of all packaging as possible is made from materials that are biodegradable in landfills. Therefore, it is always a change for the worse to replace packaging made from paper or cardboard with packaging made from plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills.


Which of the following, if true, constitutes the strongest objection to the argument above?


(A) The paper and cardboard used in packaging are usually not biodegradable in landfills.


(B) Some plastic used in packaging is biodegradable in landfills.


(C) In many landfills, a significant proportion of space is taken up by materials other than discarded packaging materials.


(D) It is impossible to avoid entirely the use of packaging materials that are not biodegradable in landfills.A


(E) Sometimes, in packaging an item, plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills are combined with cardboard.


请问B为什么不对,A从前面一个方面说,B正好从另一个方面讲,我觉得A和B都是可以的。


谢谢!


沙发
发表于 2004-4-17 11:17:00 | 只看该作者

我同意A, B都是削弱, 但你要考虑which one is stronger

SOME plastic..... 只是说明存在这种可能, 并不strong

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-17 14:28:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢delldell兄,replace packaging made from paper or cardboard with packaging made from plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills. 我看到这段话,明白了。
地板
发表于 2006-8-12 16:04:00 | 只看该作者

二樓說的有理

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 23:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部