ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2006|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-5-40 查过,人傻智商低

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-16 23:27:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-5-40 查过,人傻智商低

GWD-5-40
    

Q40:

Community
activist: If Morganville wants to keep its central shopping district
healthy, it should prevent the opening of a huge SaveAll discount
department store on the outskirts of Morganville. Records from other
small towns show that whenever SaveAll has opened a store outside the
central shopping district of a small town, within five years the town
has experienced the bankruptcies of more than a quarter of the stores
in the shopping district.


            

The answer to which of the following would be most useful for evaluating the community activist’s reasoning?


            

  1. Have
    community activists in other towns successfully campaigned against the
    opening of a SaveAll store on the outskirts of their towns?
  2. Do a large percentage of the residents of Morganville currently do almost all of their shopping at stores in Morganville?
  3. In
    towns with healthy central shopping districts, what proportion of the
    stores in those districts suffer bankruptcy during a typical five-year
    period?
  4. What proportion of the employees at the SaveAll store on the outskirts of Morganville will be drawn form Morganville?
  5. Do newly opened SaveAll stores ever lose money during their first five years of operation?
lawyer 说evalutation 的题正反有两个大案
但是,a,b 不也是这样吗???
我觉得我没抓住关键点
沙发
发表于 2006-7-17 00:02:00 | 只看该作者
Allen,你把题文当作BF题来做一下,看看哪个是前提,哪个是结论。这样你就清楚了。
板凳
发表于 2006-7-17 01:55:00 | 只看该作者

If Morganville wants to keep its central shopping district healthy, it should prevent the opening of a huge SaveAll discount department store on the outskirts of Morganville.

这个是这个text的前提,说的是its central shopping district会被opening of a huge save all discount department store影响。我昨天也犯了这样一种错误,我现在觉得是evaluating的题目和support的题目是不一样的。evaluating的题目主要集中在与文章内容有联系,而support的题目只要有旁支支持文章的结论就可以,比如我昨天讨论的题目如下:

以下是引用化装舞会在2006-7-16 12:11:00的发言:

但是下面这个选项为什么错呢?

Whether seeds genetically engineered to produce insect-resistant crops generate significantly lower per acre crop yields than do currently used seeds?

this choice is wrong b/c it is not the focus of the argument, it is only one of the many factors that can make the two seeds different. Other factors such as better taste, better looking can play some role. however, to the author, the only important factor is just pesticide itself. Hence, your choice is irrelevant.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 13:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部