ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1171|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]11OG-153

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-21 10:28:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]11OG-153

153. Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar

energy directly into electricity far more
                    
cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold

of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise

in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is

unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency

of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.

(B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased

raw material costs for that equipment.

(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.

(D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.

(E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become

economically viable.

ANSWER:C

WHY??

沙发
发表于 2006-6-21 10:39:00 | 只看该作者
this question was discussed yesterday or two days ago. please check for it.
板凳
发表于 2006-6-21 10:40:00 | 只看该作者
it was under og10, but I forgot the #. sorry about that.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-21 10:45:00 | 只看该作者
I've checked it out.Thank u.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 01:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部