ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (SUCB)

00:00:00

Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1532|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG11th-6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-17 21:54:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG11th-6

OG11th CR Q6

Not all life depends on energy from sunlight. Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth, and bacteria have been found on the deep ocean floor feeding on hydrogen and other gases rising from the interior of the Earth through vents in the ocean floor.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The location in the bedrock where microbial life was found was not near a system of volcanic vents through which hydrogen and other gases rose from the interior of the Earth.

(B) Bacteria are able to exist at the molten center of the Earth.

(C)  A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient  to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.

(D) Life probably exists on Sun-orbiting comets, which are cold agglomerations of space dust and fronzen gases.

(E) Finding bacterial remains in coal and oil would establish that the bacteria had been feeding on substances that had not been produced fromt energy of sunlight.

我选了E,答案是C;现在知道E是不对的,但C为何成为正确答案。请NN指教!

沙发
发表于 2006-6-17 22:38:00 | 只看该作者

Please take a look at the bold-faced words below:

(C)  A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.

C is right b/c microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth. That means the microbial life is not on the surface of the earth.

E is not right b/c coal and oil  were originally produced from energy of sunlight

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-18 19:02:00 | 只看该作者
还是不太明白,尤其是对C选项的理解:调查不足以怀疑行星不蕴含生命!(是这样吗?)跟文中Argument(不是所有生命都来自于阳光。)有何关联?这个推理链怎样成立?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-19 15:58:00 | 只看该作者
来,自己顶一下!
5#
发表于 2006-6-19 22:54:00 | 只看该作者

try to understand the meaning of the two sentences below:

Microbial life has been found in bedrock more than five kilometers below the surface of the Earth

(C)  A thorough survey of a planet's surface is insufficient to establish beyond a doubt that the planet contains no life.

they  are basically the same. Hence, C is a conclusion.

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-20 16:49:00 | 只看该作者

不知是否可以得到以下两点:

1. Microbial life属于life的一种;2. plant应该包括surface和below the surface。

若他们都成立;则:the plant contains life。(题干是想证明这个吗?且C选项只提到surface!)

回到原题:not all life from sunlight {= some life not from sunlight e.g.: Microbial and bacteria}。个人以为:结论中至少应该有sunlight吧!?

7#
发表于 2006-6-21 10:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用blau在2006-6-20 16:49:00的发言:

不知是否可以得到以下两点:

1. Microbial life属于life的一种;2. plant应该包括surface和below the surface。

若他们都成立;则:the plant contains life。(题干是想证明这个吗?且C选项只提到surface!)

回到原题:not all life from sunlight {= some life not from sunlight e.g.: Microbial and bacteria}。个人以为:结论中至少应该有sunlight吧!?

Take a deep breath.  Don't  spend too much time to make it so complicated,  and try to understand the context itself.  Oh, yes, please read my explanation a few more times.  You will be OK.

8#
发表于 2006-8-15 02:52:00 | 只看该作者

mbz的意思是不是这样:

   C答案是这样一个逻辑:不是所有的生命都依靠阳光,地表下面也有生命发现,所以一个光靠一个行星地表的完全调查(尽管没有生命),也不能说整个行星没有生命(因为地表下面可能有不依靠阳光的生命)

  LZ觉得这样说是不是直接一些


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-15 2:54:05编辑过]
9#
发表于 2008-1-2 10:03:00 | 只看该作者

3x

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-19 11:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部