ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1827|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全-1-17题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-24 15:31:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全-1-17题




请教大全Test1-17题

17.       Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.



Which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility, constitutes the most serious disadvantage for companies of using the method above for evaluating the financial benefit of new manufacturing processes?



(A) The costs of materials required by the new process might not be known with certainty.



(B) In several years interest rates might go down, reducing the interest costs of borrowing money to pay for the investment.



(C) Some cost-cutting processes might require such expensive investments that there would be no net gain for many years, until the investment was paid for by savings in the manufacturing process.



(D) Competitors that do invest in a new process might reduce their selling prices and thus take market share away from companies that do not.D



(E) The period of year chosen for averaging out the cost of the investment might be somewhat longer or shorter, thus affecting the result.



我觉得A和E好像也听好啊,都是讲investment的不确定性,从而disadavantage那个evaluation的方法啊。大家以为如何?感谢


沙发
发表于 2004-8-24 18:29:00 | 只看该作者
a和e的问题是,它只说新的成本不好计算,而不是说假定成本不变是不可行的。而d明确说明,市场份额是可能变化的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-24 18:45:00 | 只看该作者

可能是我对于经济学不很懂,还不是很明白。不过怎样也很感谢cranberry

地板
发表于 2004-8-24 22:32:00 | 只看该作者
不需要经济学的基础吧,文章指出,在假定成本、售价和市场份额都不变的情况下,来讨论是否采取新的process,然而d指出,采取与否可能会影响市场份额。a说的是,采用新process,一些必须的材料的成本不好确定,但不好确定不一定是一定会变化,e说的是投资的收回,和成本有关但一样不能说明成本一定会变化。
5#
发表于 2004-8-25 00:55:00 | 只看该作者

Simply put, A and E are irrelevant or out of scope. Cost of material or period is not within the reasoning of the argument. And we do not have additonal information to evaluate assertions involving the two factors. Therefore neither is correct.

The question says that the method holds the few factors constant. Then D says one of those factors is subject to change, thus refuting the argument.

Please use normal font next time. It is kinda dazzling.

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-25 04:50:00 | 只看该作者

非常感谢两位大虾,我开始明白了。

7#
发表于 2004-12-20 01:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mindfree在2004-8-25 0:55:00的发言:

Simply put, A and E are irrelevant or out of scope. Cost of material or period is not within the reasoning of the argument. And we do not have additonal information to evaluate assertions involving the two factors. Therefore neither is correct.


The question says that the method holds the few factors constant. Then D says one of those factors is subject to change, thus refuting the argument.


Please use normal font next time. It is kinda dazzling.



Mindfree兄,有一事不是十分清楚,无关词(无关选项)排除法我始终不敢洋洋洒洒的用。比如这道题的A选项,因为其涉及的cost of materails的确是成本因素的一个部分。虽然在此题中A综合其后边的话,是无关选项。但是如果A改成cost of materials is deem to change. (or there is no way that cost of material can be constant),这样一来也构成了对题干的一个削弱,这样,我就再看题的时候不敢随便排除了。我的想法正确吗?还是我又误入歧途了。谢谢!
8#
发表于 2004-12-22 15:39:00 | 只看该作者
小顶一下。呵呵!
9#
发表于 2008-3-12 05:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用bigp在2004-12-20 1:55:00的发言:


Mindfree兄,有一事不是十分清楚,无关词(无关选项)排除法我始终不敢洋洋洒洒的用。比如这道题的A选项,因为其涉及的cost of materails的确是成本因素的一个部分。虽然在此题中A综合其后边的话,是无关选项。但是如果A改成cost of materials is deem to change. (or there is no way that cost of material can be constant),这样一来也构成了对题干的一个削弱,这样,我就再看题的时候不敢随便排除了。我的想法正确吗?还是我又误入歧途了。谢谢!

A 说改革以后的cost无法确定,这其实不要紧。只要作为基准的改革前的cost不变就可以了。所以你该写以后的cost change要看在说哪个cost,改革后的cost还是“基准cost”

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 09:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部