[求助]GWD-24-7!

明白啦！

I.人类侵人家象在前,所以造成…后果，所以考虑了建立保护区。

II.可象还是冲过来抢。

答案D just fill the gap.

谢谢啦！！！  

不过题目"even if elephant sanctuaries were ..."很诓人,如果是建立保护区在前

7

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries避难所 were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding袭击(指大象对庄稼)would likely persist, since            

1. when elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.无关

2. Foraging elephants 觅食的大象have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.对raiding的理解有误.

3. Some of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has been allowed to return to its natural state.无关

4. Elephants tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source.

5. Elephant sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.

矛盾选项,而不是解释原文.