|
不知道有没有人问过，入门者，还请各位赐教^^ 54. It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nuclear weapons.
But if United States companies do not do so, companies in other countries will.
Which of the following is most like the argument above in its logical structure?
(A) It is true that it is against the police department’s policy to negotiate with kidnappers. But if the police want
to prevent loss of life, they must negotiate in some cases.
(B) it is true that it is illegal to refuse to register for military service. But there is a long tradition in the United
States of conscientious objection to serving in the armed forces. (C) It is true that it is illegal for a government official to participate in a transaction in which there is an apparent
conflict of interest. But if the facts are examined carefully, it will clearly be seen that there was no actual conflict
of interest in the defendant’s case.
(D) It is true that it is against the law to burglarize people’s homes. But someone else certainly would have
burglarized that house if the defendant had not done so first.
(E) It is true that company policy forbids supervisors to fire employees without two written warnings. But there
have been many supervisors who have disobeyed this policy. 答案是The argument in the passage acknowledges that a certain action contravenes a law, but it presents an excuse
for the action by presupposing that someone will inevitably break this law. Only choice D shares all these
features, and is thus the best answer. 看了解释也是不很理解其中的逻辑推理过程啊，不知道怎样来理解所谓的“share all these features ”? 各位可不可以用中文来讲讲你们看这题的逻辑推理过程？以及这种类比题的解题要点，感觉很难把握这种类比题（包括在阅读中的）。。。。 谢谢啦 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2006-6-1 14:08:00
楼主
