ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1510|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

xdf6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-5-31 20:33:00 | 只看该作者

xdf6

.       Ross: The profitability of Company X, restored to private ownership five years ago, is clear evidence that businesses will always fare better under private than under public ownership.

Julia: Wrong. A close look at the records shows that X has been profitable since the appointment of a first-class manager, which happened while X was still in the pubic sector.

Which of the following best describes the weak point in Ross’s claim on which Julia’s response focuses?

(A) The evidence Ross cites comes from only a single observed case, that of Company X.

(B) The profitability of Company X might be only temporary.

(C) Ross’s statement leaves open the possibility that the cause he cites came after the effect he attributes to it.

(D) No mention is made of companies that are partly government owned and partly privately owned.C

(E) No exact figures are given for the current profits of Company X.

c什么意思,怎么 WEAKEN了/ 为什么A错。

沙发
发表于 2006-5-31 23:10:00 | 只看该作者

c指出ross在此之后因此之过的错误,所以weaken

julia并没有指出ross样本数量不足的错误,题目问的是julia的态度

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-31 23:15:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢 kallyli

 “此之后因此之过的错误” 能否结合题目 解释一下。

不慎感激~

地板
发表于 2006-6-1 00:24:00 | 只看该作者

c说ross的陈述使“他所说的原因发生在结果之后(而这个结果他认为是由那个原因导致的)这种情况”成为可能。因为ross的意思就是company x 被私有化后公司盈利,所以公司盈利由私有化引起。而julia说在公司被私有化之前公司也盈利,所以这就导致ross认为的原因(私有化)发生在了结果(盈利)之后,从而weaken。

解释清楚了么?都12:30了~~~~

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-1 09:31:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kallyli在2006-6-1 0:24:00的发言:

c说ross的陈述使“他所说的原因发生在结果之后(而这个结果他认为是由那个原因导致的)这种情况”成为可能。因为ross的意思就是company x 被私有化后公司盈利,所以公司盈利由私有化引起。而julia说在公司被私有化之前公司也盈利,所以这就导致ross认为的原因(私有化)发生在了结果(盈利)之后,从而weaken。

解释清楚了么?都12:30了~~~~

解释的  很清楚 。 谢谢 kallyli。 都 12:30 了。还为我 解疑。感激不尽~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 16:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部