ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1364|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-C-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-14 23:16:00 | 只看该作者

大全-C-4

   Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago. Three years ago, Mainline hired QualiCo Advertising Agency to handle its promotions and advertising division. Today Mainline’s profits are over 20 percent higher than they were five years ago and 10 percent higher than they were three years ago. Employee ownership and a good advertising agency have combined to make Mainline more profitable.

Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?

(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.

(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.

(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.

(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.

(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.

帮帮忙,期待牛人出现.为什么是A啊

沙发
发表于 2008-6-15 00:34:00 | 只看该作者

the conclusion of the argument is that Employee ownership and a good advertising agency have combined to make Mainline more profitable.

However, it fails to specify how the two factors are combined to raise the profits of the firm. Futhermore, the author doesn't provide any evidences about how the change of ownership influences the revenue.

So, A is correct anwser.

B is obviously wrong. The comparison between the profit of Mainline Airway and that of other firms is irrelvant to the argument at all.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-13 12:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部