ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1354|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-1-14

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-12 00:52:00 | 只看该作者

大全-1-14

Federal agricultural programs aimed at benefiting one group whose livelihood depends on farming often end up harming another such group.


Which of the following statements provides support for the claim above?


I. An effort to help feed-grain producers resulted in higher prices for their crops, but the higher prices decreased the profits of livestock producers.


II. In order to reduce crop surpluses and increase prices, growers of certain crops were paid to leave a portion of their land idle, but the reduction was not achieved because improvements in fficiency resulted in higher production on the land in use.


III. Many farm workers were put out of work when a program meant to raise the price of grain provided grain growers with an incentive to reduce production by giving them surplus grain from government reserves.


(A)  I, but not Ⅱ and not III


(B) Ⅱ, but not I and not III


(C)  I and III, but not Ⅱ


(D) Ⅱ and III, but not I


(E)  I,Ⅱand III


I is a must. II can be ruled out. Why III ? I don't understand what it means.


Thanks!

沙发
发表于 2004-12-12 15:15:00 | 只看该作者

怎么没人回?帮你顶。

III:很多farm workers 因此而失业了,所以也符合benefiting one group while harming another group.

板凳
发表于 2006-4-29 14:23:00 | 只看该作者

还是请教关于III,政府的目的是raise the price of grain,并没有明确是要帮助哪一个group啊?


为什么要选呢?


帖子很久了,请帮忙看下啊

地板
发表于 2006-5-3 11:24:00 | 只看该作者
没有人回啊,nn帮忙啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 04:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部