ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1286|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11th--23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-17 12:23:00 | 只看该作者

OG11th--23

 With the emergence of biotechnology companies, it was feared that they would impose silence about proprietary results on their in-house researchers and their academic consultants. This constraint, in turn, would slow the development of biological science and engineering.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the prediction of scientific secrecy described above?

(A) Biotechnological research funded by industry has reached some conclusions that are of major scientific importance.

(B) When the results of scientific research are kept secret, independent researchers are unable to build on those results.

(C) Since the research priorities of biotechnology companies are not the same as those of academic institutions, the financial support of research by such companies distorts the research agenda.

(D) To enhance the companies’ standing in the scientific community, the biotechnology companies encourage employees to publish their results, especially results that are important.

(E) Biotechnology companies devote some of their research resources to problems that are of fundamental scientific importance and that are not expected to produce immediate practical applications.

请问下:这道题选D,这样解释对吗? 

结论:生物科技公司要求研究者对科研成果保密,减缓了生物科学工程的发展.

答案:生物科学公司鼓励研究者发表重要的科研成果,促进了生物科学工程的发展.

是不是说明否命题对原命题是一种"形式"上的削弱呢?

谢谢NN指点!

                                                    

沙发
发表于 2009-2-17 12:50:00 | 只看该作者

D推翻了题目的前提。

题目的前提是:公司会对自己的研究保密

结论是:这种保密会限制行业的发展

D说,公司不会对自己的研究保密,所以就推翻了原文的前提,也就推翻了原文的结论。

板凳
发表于 2009-2-17 13:51:00 | 只看该作者

同意楼上说的,是一种对前提的推翻来削弱结论!!!!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-17 20:25:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢指点!

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-18 13:46:00 | 只看该作者

再问下NN相关的两道题目(我认为相关,不知道是不是相关?)

54. Most employees in the computer industry move from company to company, changing jobs several times in their careers. However, Summit Computers is known throughout the industry for retaining its employees. Summit credits its success in retaining employees to its informal, nonhierarchical work environment.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports Summit’s explanation of its success in retaining employees?

(A) Some people employed in the computer industry change jobs if they become bored with their current projects.

(B) A hierarchical work environment hinders the cooperative exchange of ideas that computer industry employees consider necessary for their work.

(C) Many of Summit’s senior employees had previously worked at only one other computer company.

(D) In a non-hierarchical work environment, people avoid behavior that might threaten group harmony and thus avoid discussing with their colleagues any dissatisfaction they might have with their jobs.

(E) The cost of living near Summit is relatively low compared to areas in which some other computer companies are located.

前提是:非正式和非等级化的工作环境

结论是:留住员工

答案B说明等级化的工作环境留不住员工.是推翻前提,来推翻结论吗? 但是这是加强题

56.   Social scientists are underrepresented on the advisory councils of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Since these councils advise NIH directors and recommend policy, the underrepresentation of social scientists results in a relative lack of NIH financial support for research in the social sciences.

If the statements above are correct, they most strongly support which of the following?

(A) A significant increase in the size of NIH advisory councils would be required in order to increase the representation of social scientists on these councils.

(B) A significant increase in the representation of social scientists on NIH advisory councils would result in an increase in NIH funding for social science research.

(C) A significant increase in funding for social science research would result in improved policy recommendations to NIH directors.

(D) A significant increase in funding for the training of social scientists would result in an increase in the number of social scientists on NIH advisory councils.

(E) A significant increase in the representation of social scientists on NIH advisory councils would have to precede any increase in the number of NIH directors who are social scientists.

前提是:在NIH里缺乏社会科学家

结论是:NIH在资金上很少投放到社科研究

答案B增加NIH的社会科学家,就会增加NIH在社科研究上的资金投入.是推翻前提来推翻结论吗?但它也是加强题

非常困惑,请NN帮助解释下.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 13:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部