感觉这题B/E都正确,如果JJ作者记忆正确的话,很难分辨出哪一个更好
.... amounted 40,000 people in the LACE>United StatesLACE>, double in LACE>MexicoLACE> in 1940.>>
a) double>>
b) double the number of those
c) twice the number
d) twice those those指代people,twice不能接人
e) twice as many as those
参考下面很经典的两题,你会对倍数表达和出题点有一定的感觉和熟悉度
51. According to surveys by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, about 20 percent of young adults used cocaine in 1979, doubling those reported in the 1977 survey.
(A) doubling those reported in the 1977 survey
(B) to double the number the 1977 survey reported
(C) twice those the 1977 survey reported
(D) twice as much as those reported in the 1977 survey(E)
(E) twice the number reported in the 1977 survey
4. A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation’s clergy, twice as much as 1977.
(A) twice as much as 1977
(B) twice as many as 1977
(C) double what it was in 1977
(D) double the figure for 1977 (D)
(E) a number double that of 1977’s
Diction
Some quantities, such as people, can be counted; other quantities, such as respect, cannot. It can be said that a person earned much respect, or that many people attended an event. Here, much is incorrectly applied to ministers. As 1977 in correctly completes the comparison; it would have to be as many as in 1977, which is not one of the possible answer. Another way to make the comparison emphasizes the number, 20,736; a number can be doubled. Double the figure for 1977 places the focus on the number and correctly completes the comparison.
A Much incorrectly refers to ministers; as should be as in
B As 1977 does not correctly complete this comparison; it should be as in 1977
C What it was is awkward, wordy and unclear
D Correct. Double the figure places the emphasis of the sentence on the number of ministers; for 1977 correctly completes the comparison.
E Wordy and awkward construction
|