[求助]大全-D-11

11.  Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.

Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.

Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?

(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.

(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.

(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.

(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.

(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.

这道题，答案是A....但是貌似我完全没搞明白...我选的D.- -请NN帮助纠正一下思路。

谢谢！

G:那些支持免除送孩子到私立学校的家长的学费税的人,认为没有享受政府服务的人不应该为其付费。然而那些选择瓶装水，不用当地供水系统的人却没有被免除缴纳维护供水系统的税费。

R:你的推论是不合逻辑的。法律规定儿童必须上学。既然不是能够选择的，而是法律规定，那么政府要求某些家长为其付2次费就是不公平的。

题目是要你找支持G的，削弱R的论述。D，法律规定儿童必须上学，没有规定上私立，只要上了学就行，不管公立私立。这个恰恰说明学校是可以选择的，乃是削弱R的论断的。R一直坚持称必然性，没有选择性。

A,尽管饮用水没有法律规定，但是是人们必需品。因此我的类比是恰当的。G在此套用R的论述，来坚持自己的类比证据是充分的，合理的。

谢谢啊。不过我还是有点不太明白。。。

这个是不是law规定的和G说的免除tax有什么关系啊？ 你说，没有规定上私立，只要上了学就行，不管公立私立。这个恰恰说明学校是可以选择的，乃是削弱R的论断的； 这句话什么意思啊。- -； 学校可以选择怎么削弱啊。- -；汗，我已经晕了。。

可不可以说的再明白一点，就是用比如，这个题的逻辑关系到底是怎样？

我搞不清楚law和他的结论有什么关系。。。- -

sorry，D是支持R的论述的吧，我大概写错了。

用大老粗的语言给你解释下---

G说上私立学校不免税是合理的。那些买矿泉水，不用自来水的人不也没免税吗？

R。你不对。喝水这件事情能选择，上学是法律规定的，不能选择。不管你上私立还是公立，都得上。既然这样，那上私立的付税就不合理了。

G说，对啊,我举例喝水跟你说的情况不是一样吗？不管喝矿泉水还是自来水，你不都得喝水吗？都是必须2选一的啊。