ask og 243 again

calista5133 · 发表于 2004-10-7 07:34:00

243. Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume.

(A)    far exceeds those that humans could consume

(B)    exceeds by far those humans can consume

(C)    far exceeds those humans are able to consume

(D)    exceed by far those able to be consumed by humans

(E)    far exceed those that humans could consume

Choices B and C omit the conjunction that _an omission that is grammatically acceptable, but in the case of this sentence diminishes clarity.

how to understand this sentense?

G_KEVIN · 发表于 2004-10-7 10:45:00

因为those 可以与后面的humans结合，组成those humans作为consume的逻辑主语；

calista5133 · 发表于 2004-10-7 12:49:00

sigh,you are right,the head is filled with the concept that those refers to the amounts and can not switch to the compound words those humans

i got it,thanks.

calista5133 · 发表于 2004-10-7 12:49:00

sigh,you are right,the head is filled with the concept that those refers to the amounts and can not switch to the compound words those humans

i got it,thanks.

wwwhahchn · 发表于 2004-12-3 13:42:00

以下是引用G_KEVIN在2004-10-7 10:45:00的发言：

因为those 可以与后面的humans结合，组成those humans作为consume的逻辑主语；

duxin · 发表于 2005-5-17 10:15:00

og的解释中说，省略that在语法上是可以接受的，请问这句话是什么意思？在定语从句中的that若不出现此题中的特殊情况是否都可省略呢？求助nn!!!

rakesun · 发表于 2005-5-17 11:20:00

为了简洁，定语从句中的that是能省就省。宾语从句中的that到是一般不能省的

duxin · 发表于 2005-5-18 16:08:00

在什么情况下，定语从句中的that可以省略呢，有前辈总结过的经验吗？

Avantasia · 发表于 2005-5-18 18:40:00

当that做后面的宾语的时候, 可以考虑省略, 但是有不省略的情况, 主要还是看是否会产生歧义.

nevia · 发表于 2005-5-18 19:07:00

当that所指代的部分做后面的宾语的时候, 可以考虑省略,

ask og 243 again

ask og 243 again

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块