ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1206|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急救:feifei-26

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-3-2 13:59:00 | 只看该作者

急救:feifei-26

26. Barnes: The two newest employees at this company have salaries that are too high for the simple tasks normally assigned to new employees and duties that are too complex for inexperienced workers. Hence, the salaries and the complexity of the duties of these two newest employees should be reduced.



Which one of the following is an assumption on which Barnes’s argument depends?



A.        The duties of the two newest employees are not less complex than any others in the company.


B.        It is because of the complex duties assigned that the two newest employees are being paid more than is usually paid to newly hired employees.


C.        The two newest employees are not experienced at their occupations.


D.       Barnes was not hired at a higher-than-average starting salary.


E.        The salaries of the two newest are no higher than the salaries that other companies pay for workers with a similar level of experience.



答案C,知道为什么对


我的问题是B为什么不对?产生题干中的情况不就是因为任务复杂要求的工资高么?


feifei解释说:B: 这似乎在为两个新雇员拿高工资找理由,所以不能支持结论。



是不是这样的,结论是反对复杂工作高工资;而B的解释恰恰支持了这个结论反对的论断?



是否解释的选项不可以作为assumption?



谢谢

沙发
发表于 2006-3-2 20:36:00 | 只看该作者

Barnes’s argument 是the salaries...should be reduced.


B是在解释为什么salary高,可能是正确的解释也可能是错误的。但不论解释正确与否,都和argument没有什么关系啊。

板凳
发表于 2006-3-2 23:35:00 | 只看该作者

我认为应该从两方面都去考虑,B 只考虑了工资高没有考虑工作的复杂。C 更全面一些


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 09:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部