ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1820|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG 11 VERBAL-44

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-12-6 15:03:00 | 只看该作者

请教OG 11 VERBAL-44

请教OG 11 VERBAL-44

44Laws requiring the use of headlights during daylight hours can prevent automobile collisions. However, since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator, any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countriesIn factthe only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.

Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?

(A)  Drivers in the continental United States who used their headlights during the day would be just as likely to become involved in a collision as would drivers who did not use their headlights

(B)  In many countries that are farther from the equator than is the continental United States poor daylight visibility is the single most important factor in automobile collisions-

(C)  The proportion of automobile collisions that occur in the daytime is greater in the continental United States than in the countries that have daytime headlight laws

(D)  Fewer automobile collisions probably occur each year in countries that have daytime headlight laws than occur within the continental United States

(E)  Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws

 

Argument Construction

Situation Laws requiring the use of headlights during the daytime are more effective at preventing car collisions in countries with 10wer daylight visibility, that isin countries at greater distances from the equatorThe only countries having these laws are those located farther from the equator than is the continental US

Reasoning What conclusion can be drawn from this information? Countries with daytime headlight laws are all farther from the equator than is the continental USThe location is significant because daytime visibility is worse in those countries than it is in the continental USHow effective at preventing collisions would such laws be in the continental United States with its greater proximity to the equator? It is reasonable to conclude that such laws would be less effective at preventing collisions there than they are in the countries farther from the equator

A  This contradicts the given information that daytime headlight laws can prevent automobile collisions Although daytime headlight use may be less effective in countries with more daylightit cannot be concluded that USdrivers using daytime headlights would gain no benefit from them and would have collisions the same as those who do not

B  The passage offers no evidence for the conclusion that poor visibilityis the greatest cause for collisions in these countries

C  Data are required to make judgments about the proportion of daytime collisions·

D  Without specific datano conclusion can be drawn about the relative number of accidents that occur

E  CorrectThis statement properly identifies a conclusion to be drawn from the given information.

The correct answer is E

1.看完OG的解释,思路还是不清晰,麻烦大家帮忙看下,正确选项是怎样推出来的!

2. How effective at preventing collisions would such laws be in the continental United States with its greater proximity to the equator?

应该怎样理解?

总觉得本题强调的不是距离的问题,而是有效性的问题,大家怎么看呢?

谢谢!

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-12-6 15:07:00 | 只看该作者

备用

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-12-6 15:13:00 | 只看该作者

我的思路:

HL法确有效,

但确有此法的国家是在比US本土还远的远离赤道的国家。

结论:(E

此法将起到较小的作用在US本土相比于在有该法的国家(即,远离赤道的国家的其它国家)。

 

请大家指点!

 

地板
发表于 2006-12-6 16:01:00 | 只看该作者

思路:

首先如果按照lawyer分类,这题应该是must be true题型
从提干能得到如下的信息:
L能prevent collisions
L在白天光线较弱的国家效果更明显,离赤道越远的国家,白天的光线越弱
事实上正是那些比美国离赤道还要元的国家拥有这些法律
A)和题目没什么关系,而且这个结论还是个错的结论
B)原提干中没有列出其他能导致collision德原因,所以不能推出the most important factor,所以错
C)文章中只比了效果,并没有比collision德proportion,所以错
D)文章中没有对collsion德数量进行比较,而且就算L能prevent automobile collisions,那也不能推出US的collision就要多,所以错
E)答案  do less to和原文的more effective刚好对应上了

 

2. How effective at preventing collisions would such laws be in the continental United States with its greater proximity to the equator?

我觉得这里OG得意思可能就是告诉我们只是比较effective并没有比较具体collision得数目,以及弱光是导致collision得最重要的原因

不知道有没有说清楚呢~~~

5#
发表于 2006-12-6 16:09:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用KATIEUS在2006-12-6 15:03:00的发言:

1.看完OG的解释,思路还是不清晰,麻烦大家帮忙看下,正确选项是怎样推出来的!

2. How effective at preventing collisions would such laws be in the continental United States with its greater proximity to the equator?

应该怎样理解?

总觉得本题强调的不是距离的问题,而是有效性的问题,大家怎么看呢?

同意~~How effective at preventing collisions would such laws be in the continental United States with its greater proximity to the equator?这个问题也就是问你L在US和那些比US离赤道还要元的国家得效果是怎么样的~~

谢谢!

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-12-6 16:19:00 | 只看该作者

明白啦,谢谢!

问题还是在有效性上!

 

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-12-6 16:29:00 | 只看该作者

再请姐姐证实一下,

Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?

这类题在做法上跟一般的MUST BE TRUE 的区别

 

这类题在做法上跟一般的MUST BE TRUE 的区别

 

8#
发表于 2006-12-6 16:51:00 | 只看该作者

这类题目就属于must be true得题型~~因为都是从提干的信息推出的答案的~~你可以去看看lawyer分类~~虽然他说的方法我还没太看明白,但是可以做分类的题目从而自己可以悟出一些做题目的方法的~~然后再和lawyer得方法对比一下~~

but i've not yet understand the Lawyer's method~~hehe~~

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-12-6 17:29:00 | 只看该作者

好的,谢谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-25 04:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部