ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3751|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-18-4 NN进来呀

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-16 19:58:00 | 只看该作者

大全-18-4 NN进来呀














4.     olitician:
Fewer people are entering the labor market now than previously. If the economy
grows, the demand for motivated and educated people will far outstrip the
supply. Some companies have already started to respond to this labor-market
situation by finding better ways to keep their current employees. Their concern
is a sure indicator that the economy is growing.

Which of the following is the best
criticism of the politician’s reasoning?

(A) The fact
that companies are making prudent preparations for a possible future
development does not mean that this development is already taking place.

(B) The fact
that some companies now try harder to keep their employees does not mean that
they used to be indifferent to employee morale.

(C) The fact
that demand will outstrip supply does not mean that there will be no supply at
all.

(D) The fact
that the number of new entrants into the labor market is declining does not
mean that the number of new entrants is lower than it has ever been.(A)

(E) The fact that
current employees have become more valuable to some companies does not mean
that those employees will do their jobs better than they used to.4




the answer is A.其他选项均可排除。

思路

前提:劳动力供不应求的时候—>经济是发展的

结论:公司正为这种情况做准备—>所以经济是发展的


我这里的问题是have already started to respond to this labor-market
situation如何理解。因为公司“already started to respond to this labor-market situation”,所以此处的labor-market
situation是已经存在的,但是如果根据A的理解的话,公司只是在为可能到来的情况做准备。

那么如何解释公司respond的situation呢?

我唯一找到的解释是这里的situation讲的是Fewer people are entering the labor market now than previously。

请指教。


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-16 20:01:00 | 只看该作者
另外我实在看不出Fewer people are entering the labor market now than previously.和the demand for motivated and educated people will far outstrip the
supply有啥关系??

我觉得这题各个部分的逻辑关系很混。。。

板凳
发表于 2004-12-18 14:56:00 | 只看该作者
up!我也想知道,为什么选A?D错在哪里呢?
地板
发表于 2004-12-19 21:57:00 | 只看该作者

up!

5#
发表于 2004-12-20 09:13:00 | 只看该作者
我的理解是

現在有比較少人進入勞工市場  如果經濟成長 對於積極且教育程度好的人的需求就會增加

題目給的 是有些公司已經開始應付這種情形 採用更好的方法來保留住目前的員工    就下了經濟已經開始成長的結論



但是這結論有缺點   因為有可能因為像是那些公司有離職潮 或是 其他因素使得公司要想辦法留住員工  原文的結論下的太早 因為無法從原文中得知 "對於積極且教育程度好的人的需求增加" 這個條件



A指出這點  D 並沒有針對原文的缺點做批評

6#
发表于 2005-8-12 14:10:00 | 只看该作者
B错哪了?
7#
发表于 2005-8-13 01:11:00 | 只看该作者

整理原文的推理过程因为招不到好的员工),公司想办法留人,=>需求大于供应=>经济在发展.原文结论的推理过程好像是反向的.另外从结构上看:先提供推理的原理,再应用到事实,得出结论.

8#
发表于 2005-9-19 12:16:00 | 只看该作者

前提:economy grows——> demand上升


结论:Some companies finding better ways to keep their current employees——>


      economy grows



(A) The fact that companies are making prudent有先见之明的 preparations for a possible future development does not mean that this development is already taking place.即逆命题不成立


9#
发表于 2006-7-16 10:52:00 | 只看该作者
B的employee morale明显无关阿
10#
发表于 2008-9-17 00:02:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得这题的错误在于把充分必要关系弄反了,但是选项中没有这个选项,排除法只能选A。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-7-18 21:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部