[求助]Anchoret邏輯真題14

14. In January of last year the Moviemania chain of moive theaters started propping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the less healthful coconut oil that it had been using until then. Now Moviemania is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania's own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania's claim?(A)

A. Total sales of all refreshments at Moviemania's movie theaters increased by less than 5 percent last year.

B. Moviemania makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of moive tickets.

C. Moivemania's customers prefer the taste of popcorn popped in coconut oil to that of popcorn popped in canola oil.

D. Total attendance at Moivemania's movie theaters was more than 20 percent bigger last year than the year before.

E. The year before last, Moviemania experienced a 10 percent increase in popcorn sales over the previous year.

我想請問(A)與(D)

(A) refreshments賣的好, 不一定表示popcorn賣的好

(D) 入場人數增加, 不一定表示popcorn賣的好

why choose A?

恩 ？这T 是在问SUPPOTR 那 不同意SWITCH BACK 的说法吧！ supports the argument against Moviemania's claim

D 怎么都是无关的啊 ！ATTENDENCE 是无关的！

这T 选A ？ ？那不就成了同意SWITCH 了吗！

BTW ： MM 这T 是什么？是GWD 里面的吗？我怎么不知道有 Anchoret邏輯真題！

原文推理：因为去年P的销售比前年多5%，所以去年用的canola oil has hurt popcorn sales的说法是错的。

问题：SUPPORT

A说总体的点心销售增加还没有5%。言下之意P的5%的增加算高的。所以支持结论（去年用的canola oil has hurt popcorn sales的说法是错的。）

hehe 看看MATH 跑来看逻辑 ！看到LAWYER 的这个回帖

BOBO 竟然把 REFRESHMENT 当成了REFINEMENT 以为是改良后的POR CORN   怎么会这么粗心啊 害的我刚才盯在这T 上足足有10分钟 都看不出破绽。。。

大家可都不要象我这个样子啊

BTW ： 这所谓的ANAN 的真题 我怎么没见过呢。。。