ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1773|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-10-13-->携隐修改标题(新东方绿皮书 逻辑99)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-16 12:30:00 | 只看该作者

大全-10-13-->携隐修改标题(新东方绿皮书 逻辑99)

99 Exports of United States wood pulp will rise considerably during this year. The reasong for this rise is that the falling value of the dollar will make it cheaper for paper manufacturers in Japan and Western Europe to buy American wood pulp than to get it from any other source.


Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?


B. The quality of the wood pulp produced in the United States would be adequate for the purposes of Japanese and Western European paper manufacturers.


C. Paper manufacturers in Japan and Western Europe would prefer to use wood pulp produced in the United States if costs were not a factor.


答案给的是B


我认为B选项和C选项的目的是一样的:即考虑到价格下降以后,日本和西欧的厂商对美国产品的进口量会增加。但实际上,B提到的是质量问题,而C涵盖的方面更广:排除价格因素的考虑,美国产品更受欢迎,这里自然包括了B中提到的质量符合要求这一条。


当然,可以说if costs were not a factor有问题。但应该是价格的下降更促进了这种偏好吧。


大家讨论一下,给个意见吧


沙发
发表于 2005-2-16 12:51:00 | 只看该作者

假设是要文章给定的信息来推理的,


逻辑是推不出prefer to 这样的答案的,因为prefer to 是一个主观色彩的词组.


C. Paper manufacturers in Japan and Western Europe would prefer to use wood pulp produced in the United States if costs were not a factor.


可以说价格成为一个因素后,日本人和欧洲人更喜欢用美国的WOOD PULP了,也可以说价格成为一个因素后,日本人和欧洲人就不喜欢用美国的WOOD PULP了,不管这价格是高了是低了。


C的问题不是在COST WERE NOT A FACTOR,而是在PREFER TO 上。

板凳
发表于 2005-6-1 08:58:00 | 只看该作者

if the costs is a factor, they will never choose American pulp because there is even cheaper pulp from Thailand.


地板
发表于 2005-6-1 10:18:00 | 只看该作者
大牛能把这段中文翻译一下,让我们好好琢磨一下?谢谢。
5#
发表于 2005-11-6 00:14:00 | 只看该作者
还是不很明白。请NN解释一下C错在哪里?
6#
发表于 2005-12-20 21:42:00 | 只看该作者

文中由华盛顿贬值,推出日本和西欧买美国的纸浆会比买其它地方的纸浆要便宜,所以纸浆出口要增加。


如果价格不是一个因素的话,日本和西欧会买美国纸浆。意即价格相同的话,美国的纸浆受欢迎。这个假设文中没有。文中只说美国的纸浆比别的地方便宜了,所以他们才买的。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 03:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部