In Colorado subalpine meadows, nonnative dandelions co-occur with a native flower, the larkspur. Bumblebees visit both species, creating the potential for interactions between the two species with respect to pollination. In a recent study, researchers selected 16 plots containing both species; all dandelions were removed from eight plots; the remaining eight control plots were left undisturbed. The control plots yielded significantly more larkspur seeds than the dandelion-free plots, leading the researchers to conclude that the presence of dandelions facilitates pollination (and hence seed production) in the native species by attracting more pollinators to the mixed plots.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the researchers’ reasoning? - ABumblebees preferentially visit dandelions over larkspurs in mixed plots.
- BIn mixed plots, pollinators can transfer pollen from one species to another to augment seed production.
- CIf left unchecked, nonnative species like dandelions quickly crowd out native species.
- DSeed germination is a more reliable measure of a species’ fitness than seed production.
- ESoil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production.
果因推理模式的题一个削弱方向就是他因
E选项毫无疑问是他因
但是我想问问B选项
因为原文说的是结论是the presence of dandelions facilitates pollination (and hence seed production) in the native species by attracting more pollinators to the mixed plots.
我认为B选项是给出了the presence of dandelions facilitates pollination 一个新的解释,不是by attracting more pollinators to the mixed plots而是transfer pollen from one species to another to augment seed production. 这不也是一种他因吗
但是OG给出的解释是 This is fully compatiable with the claim that thedandelions attracted more pollinators to the mixed plots, and it would also help to support the argument's conclusion that the dandelions facilitates pollination in those plots.
有没有大神可以解释一下啊?掉这个坑里出不来了
|