ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4556|回复: 25
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 10.5 做一只有料的狗

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-10-6 03:05:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
先来放狗狗,马上考试的同学们努力抓狗~~ 冲鸭!!       p.s. 在绝望的裤头+巴黎考点人生地不熟,找考场找了两小时简直快哭出来,外加硬件和服务烂得一批(没有耳塞!!!没有耳塞!!!十几平的小房间挤满了两三种考试的考生进进出出,还有叮咣作响的门),考试的时候一度心态炸裂觉得自己这次也就600多分……最后730(Q50 V38)算是暂时分手了,知道Q和V自己都可以考得更好但是实在心累,短时间内不折腾了……努力回忆JJ来为接下来的申请攒攒人品。

树穴:
1、看上面有狗主放了两道销售员的题,基本一致,不再赘述
2、一道有图的题: 一共五层点点,从上到下走(level 1→2→……)在每个点只能向左或右走,问从第一层到第五层一共有多少种走法(印象里面图好像没有这么复杂……但是题干确实是这样描述的,待其他狗主验证)
3、几何题:Q在弧ABC上,问PQ取值范围(顺便说一句……这道题在几年8月末的JJ中出现过,一战没有碰上,没想到二战竟然见面了,在考场上笑出来)
Q的位置我这张图里好像标错了,明天再重新画一个吧实在太累了…应该是在大弧ABC上……
                        
4、碰到了x+y除以5余1,y+z除以5余2,x+z除以5余3,求x+y+z除以5的余数是多少。字母顺序有变但是没有影响。考试前看到了这个,刚好也讨论了下,我自己是代数(x=1 y=5 z=2)不知道方法是否科学,男胖友给出了详细做法如下图,觉得很科学
                        
5、求2^100-2^96的最大质因子(提一个2^96出来,15=3*5所以最大质因子是5)
6. DS 问x<1?
   1)具体记不清,是x和|x|的分式
   2) x<|x|
7.有一个cylinder tank,直径6m,长9m(数据不确定,会思路就行),tank空着的时候是10400 pounds,里面装橄榄油,一立方橄榄油50pound,最后问装满橄榄油的tank多少ton,给了1ton=2000磅
8.PS: 1/11+……+1/20 很好做 选项大概就是1,1/2 ,1/3什么的
9.DS: 哦还有一个,说有一个warehouse里面有500个box,有15%是黄色的外壳。这些书一部分放在1st floor,一部分放在2nd floor, 问放在2nd floor的not yellow的box有多少
         1)1st floor not yellow的个数
         2)2nd floor yellow的个数

洛基:
1、逻辑碰到了5楼7楼残疾人电梯的那个!感谢那位狗主!做到那儿的时候赶时间就凭印象选了一个
2、想起来一个! 联邦政府说应该减少个人的税收减免,把这些钱给地方政府,因为大家都在用减免的那部分税收买外国进口产品,这样就只能促进外国经济发展,对本国无益。问assumption,我选的是地方政府的支出中没有大量用于购买进口产品
3、还有一个boldface:说一群考古学家说碳元素追踪法不适用于blabla,the argument is defensive, 说这种方法在测定一些东西的时候误差比较小,但是在测量一些非常老(超过100年)的东西时,基本失效。这个当时我理解了半天,原文说得比较绕,不确定自己理解得对不对,defensive大家自己理解一下吧……最后选了the first is the argument seek to support, the second is the ……???忘了
(对不起剩下的我实在想不起来了……

月度:
1、testimony,已有考古,非常详细,基本和原文一致
2、有一篇其实没太看懂……讲材料的。P1 从补牙时用的填充材料(对外部有压力引发了人们的担忧)引入,然后介绍了一些具有同样性质的其他材料(感觉是工程类的),P2承认这些材料有弊端,但同时也有好处blabla,P3介绍了3个还是4个这类材料应用带来的trend,类似积极影响之类。
这篇文章真心没太看懂,复杂的专业名词连成串那种,希望能有人考下古吧……
3、有一篇很有意思的,单细胞生物仿生实验
P1说人们利用仿生的概念做出来了很多东西,比如模仿鲨鱼皮(还是啥的,不重要)做泳衣blablabla,(有题,举这些例子的作用是什么)现在一群科学家又搞事情,用一个活物做实验从中获取灵感加以借鉴
P2具体描述了一下这个实验,一种单细胞生物叫PP, 在类似培养皿的东西里面放了36个食物,然后观察它的移动路径。把整个培养皿比作了Tokyo,它的路径就像是东京的火车线路之类的。(有题,说作者把pp这种东西比作了什么,选项有passenge, track, station还有啥的,这道题我好像纠结了半天还是做错了,应该选passenger?反正不选track..)然后说发现它的线路并不都是最优路径选最短那种,里面也有redundant的,原因是在一些线路受阻的时候可以备用
最后P3说了一下这个实验的意义,不在于指导我们应该怎样去建火车站而是这种“留一手”的方法……大概就是这个意思吧大家可以考一下古
4、collocation产业集聚,最后一篇文章,答到这里的时候狗主pace已经完全乱掉了,剩下十几题平均只剩四五十秒那种(哭),看到第二篇JJ上的文章的时候真的是感激涕零,没怎么细看文章直接答题了。和JJ基本一致。

坐稳:
一个automobile 的manager发现7月份宣传了luxury model,sales很可观,而二月份的时候宣传了类似平价model,sales比较惨淡,于是认为为了促进公司业绩,以后都要advertise luxury model.


愈发:
感觉语义语法都有考察,我碰到很多关于“比较”的知识点的题,心痛,pace被连续几道很纠结的语法拖乱了



目前只能想起来这么多,脑回路不定期重新连接,想起来再update。祝大家早日和鸡麦分手!




本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏5 收藏收藏5
沙发
发表于 2018-10-6 03:38:33 | 只看该作者
感谢分享
板凳
发表于 2018-10-6 05:45:17 | 只看该作者
是原文吗?

These industrial agglomerations may arise for a variety of idiosyncratic reasons (Myrdal 1957; Arthur 1990; Krugman 1991). But why do they persist over such long periods of time? From an evolutionary perspective, two processes could sustain these agglomerations. On the one hand, organizations in concentrated regions might perform better—and hence survive longer—than those located in sparse areas. On the other hand, new production facilities might simply open more frequently in the vicinity of industrial agglomerations. In other words, both lower failure rates and higher founding rates can sustain geographic concentration, though different forces might drive each of these processes.

Economic explanations of industrial agglomeration explicitly emphasize better performance, and implicitly lower failure rates, as the key process underlying the continuing geographic concentration of production. Theorists suggest that organizations benefit economically by locating in efficient positions. Several factors can make a location economically advantageous. In some cases, organizations benefit by minimizing the transportation costs for inputs, such as when scarce raw material, cheap factors of production, or unique skills can be obtained locally (Weber [1909] 1928). Alternatively, organizations may locate near consumers to better serve these constituents (e.g., Smithies 1941). In other cases, the colocation of structurally equivalent organizations—those that operate in the same markets—itself yields advantages to these actors regardless of the particular location they choose. Several mechanisms can drive these “economies of agglomeration,” including an extended division of labor (Marshall 1922; Chinitz 1961), common labor markets (Krugman 1991 Rotemberg and Saloner 1990), and knowledge spillovers (Scherer 1984; Saxenian 1994). All these factors presumably enhance the performance and survival chances of firms in efficient locations.

Although these explanations seem plausible, they ignore the fact that structurally equivalent organizations also compete with each other for vital resources. To the extent that geography provides another dimension along which organizations can differentiate, colocation should increase the degree of structural equivalence—and competition—between organizations (Hawley 1950; Hannan and Freeman 1977; Burt 1992). The fact that organizational ecology studies support this expectation by showing that organizations apparently compete more intensely within local population boundaries (Carroll and Wade 1991; Hannan and Carroll 1992) provides a serious challenge to traditional theories of geographic concentration.

To resolve this conundrum, we suggest an alternative explanation for the persistence of geographic concentration in production that focuses on the structure of entrepreneurial opportunities as the force maintaining industrial agglomeration. Like other forms of economic action, entrepreneurial action occurs within a web of social relations that both enable and constrain activity (Granovetter 1985). We argue that dense local concentrations of structurally equivalent organizations increase the pool of potential entrepreneurs in a region, thereby increasing founding rates. Not all individuals have equal chances of becoming successful entrepreneurs. Rather, entrepreneurial action requires knowledge of the business (Liles 1974), ties to scarce resources (Stinchcombe 1965), and self confidence (Bandura 1986). Although some of this knowledge and these resources (e.g., financial capital) might enable any potential business venture, many of these factors apply only to a particular type of enterprise. Without prior experience in the industry, a potential entrepreneur will find it difficult to acquire this specific human and social capital. Thus, the current location of production structurally constrains access to these resources.


本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
地板
发表于 2018-10-6 06:57:44 来自手机 | 只看该作者
发表于 2018-10-06 03:05:40
先来放狗狗,马上考试的同学们努力抓狗~~ 冲鸭!!       p.s. 在绝望的裤头+巴黎考点人生...

Mark一下
5#
发表于 2018-10-6 06:59:09 | 只看该作者
感恩!!!
6#
发表于 2018-10-6 07:36:22 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!               
7#
发表于 2018-10-6 07:36:57 | 只看该作者
蹭好运了!
8#
发表于 2018-10-6 07:43:02 | 只看该作者
求问楼主 那两道销售commission的题,commission fee说的只是7%*(sales-3000);还是说7%*(sales-3000)+sales?
9#
发表于 2018-10-6 08:16:20 来自手机 | 只看该作者
发表于 1小时前
感恩!!!

Mark一下
10#
发表于 2018-10-6 08:29:40 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-22 23:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部