ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2135|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

bible上一道Parallel Reasoning的题请教~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-9-28 21:56:07 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
1. Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be placed on
offshore drilling due to our country’s need for energy resources, and the possible
serious consequences if new energy reserves are not located and explored now. Of
course, the vast sums of money the oil companies stand to reap as a result of these
drilling efforts completely invalidates any such arguments.
The questionable pattern of reasoning above is most similar to which of the
following?
(A) Everyone in town was wearing boots yesterday, and everyone in town was also
carrying an umbrella. Based on this evidence it is obvious that wearing boots
causes one to carry an umbrella.
(B) The owner of a local gas station claims to be losing money, but everyone knows
that the oil industry is earning record profits, which undoubtedly proves that the
gas station’s owner must be lying.
(C) The mayor has argued strenuously in favor of a government housing subsidy. Since
such a move would benefit some town residents more than others, this plan
should not be implemented.
(D) Although the board claims that their vote in favor of the merger is in the best
interest of all shareholders, the fact that the merger will be most beneficial to the
board’s members themselves shows that other shareholders should object to the
board’s decision.
(E) The individual who cheated on yesterday’s test surely could have answered every
question correctly. Mary answered every question on the test correctly, so she
must have been the student who cheated.
正确答案是D,请问C为什么错了呢?cr bible p317

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2018-9-29 00:19:02 | 只看该作者
形式上是: A .... , 但 A 获利.... ,所以A 的argument 不成立

C , mayor ....,但他人获利,所以mayor的argument不成立

D, board members ..., 但 board members 获利,所以  board members 的 argument 不成立

简单点说就是 辩论者自己是利益牵扯者,当然替自己利益说话
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-29 10:18:34 | 只看该作者
kluivert 发表于 2018-9-29 00:19
形式上是: A .... , 但 A 获利.... ,所以A 的argument 不成立

C , mayor ....,但他人获利,所以mayor的arg ...

谢谢!!想了很久都没想通的 你这样说好像挺靠谱
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-29 14:16:59 | 只看该作者
kluivert 发表于 2018-9-29 00:19
形式上是: A .... , 但 A 获利.... ,所以A 的argument 不成立

C , mayor ....,但他人获利,所以mayor的arg ...

可以再请教您一个问题吗?
2. The cost of manufacturing microchips in Country K is 15 percent greater
than the cost of manufacturing the same microchips in Country P. Even
after customs taxes and delivery fees are considered, it is still cheaper for
Country K to import microchips from Country P than to have the
microchips manufactured domestically.
The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Customs taxes are less in Country K than they are in Country P.
(B) It takes 15 percent more time to manufacture a microchip in Country
K than it does in Country P.
(C) The taxes and fees associated with importing microchips from
Country P to Country K are less than 15 percent of the cost of
manufacturing those microchips in Country K.
(D) Importing microchips from Country P will reduce employment
opportunities in manufacturing by 15 percent in Country K.
(E) Manufacturing costs are the primary consideration for countries when
considering whether to import foreign goods.
正确答案是C,但是我觉得C有问题,因为我觉得运费应该少于P国成本的15%而不是K国国成本的15%
您能看一下吗
5#
发表于 2018-9-29 22:32:04 | 只看该作者
数学题啊
逻辑上没任何问题
15% k  > 15% p
Taxes and fees < 15% p  =>  taxes and fees < 15% k
当一个数小于两个数中较小的那个数,那它一定也小于较大的那个数
6#
发表于 2018-9-29 22:43:15 | 只看该作者
小陈冲鸭 发表于 2018-9-29 14:16
可以再请教您一个问题吗?
2. The cost of manufacturing microchips in Country K is 15 percent greate ...

直接问p 一眼就看出 问k 就糊弄一些不细心的同学

问: 张三的妹妹比你大 , 你比张三小吗?
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-30 10:50:55 | 只看该作者
kluivert 发表于 2018-9-29 22:32
数学题啊
逻辑上没任何问题
15% k  > 15% p

诶 可是如果运费介于15%p和15%k中间,也就是说它比15%p大,那么k国就不应该选择进口了
8#
发表于 2018-9-30 11:02:06 | 只看该作者
小陈冲鸭 发表于 2018-9-30 10:50
诶 可是如果运费介于15%p和15%k中间,也就是说它比15%p大,那么k国就不应该选择进口了 ...

这是逻辑题,不是猜的
题目已经说了 taxes and delivery fee 低于成本差价...让你推理数字大小而已

成本k = 1.15 p  比如p=100 那么k=115
而taxes and delivery fee低于成本差值
taxes and delivery fee< 0.15 p 或者 k-p  = 15
而15%k = 15% X 115 = 17.25

所以 taxes and delivery fee <   15  < 15% k

你自己都说  taxes and delivery fee 小于 15%p ....那怎么理解不了它也小于15%k ?            



9#
发表于 2018-9-30 11:12:45 | 只看该作者
lol
数学题啊
逻辑上没任何问题
15% k  > 15% p
Taxes and fees < 15% p 可以推出 taxes and fees < 15% k
当一个数小于两个数中较小的那个数,那它一定也小于较大的那个数
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-9-30 11:47:50 | 只看该作者
kluivert 发表于 2018-9-30 11:02
这是逻辑题,不是猜的
题目已经说了 taxes and delivery fee 低于成本差价...让你推理数字大小而已

我理解你说的… 我只是觉得emmmm不够严谨 当然我是说答案啊 不是说你
谢谢你的解答
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-8 17:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部