ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2091|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 阅读狗

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-9-25 07:16:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
四篇记得三篇,最后一篇时间来不及所有题都是飘的
没有记题目的习惯,大概说一下阅读讲了什么,具体靠考古吧


一篇是说玛雅的经济,说很难区分玛雅的经济是否是市场经济,因为有资源再分配,阶级观念什么的

一篇是说人们一直以为某岛最早的人的痕迹是13世纪,也有人说是200BC的,因为老鼠遗骸是这个时候的,人们认为老鼠是跟着人上的岛。但有critics(highlight有考题)说不对,应该是实验室搞错了什么
后来W做了实验证明老鼠最早出现在1280左右
第三段有叨叨了一些,反正就说W的实验是对的,200BC的时候这个岛上既没人也没老鼠

还有一篇第一段讲了讲Mill的一个唱片公司有什么优点,然后他们出版一个Dubrn E的作品,第二段说DE的作品一般很少有人去翻录,因为一二三个原因,第三段很短,忘了==

收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2018-9-25 07:55:44 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
板凳
发表于 2018-9-25 08:27:25 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
地板
发表于 2018-9-25 08:35:17 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
5#
发表于 2018-9-25 08:48:22 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
6#
发表于 2018-9-25 09:00:58 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!               
7#
发表于 2018-9-25 09:12:54 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
8#
发表于 2018-9-25 09:24:55 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
9#
发表于 2018-9-25 13:56:31 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
10#
发表于 2018-9-27 22:40:07 | 只看该作者
感谢构筑分享!求构筑确认一下这个是不是原文?感谢感谢!
Rats caught a free ride to New Zealand when they hopped aboard the boats of early Polynesian explorers. Now, their ancient bones may help pinpoint when humans first set foot on the island. Carbon-dating of bones from the rodents indicates that people reached New Zealand around 1280 or later, rejecting previous research that suggested humans may have landed there more than 1400 years earlier.

Although most anthropologists think that humans first arrived in New Zealand around 1250 to 1300, a minority holds that people might have set foot on the island as early as 200 B.C.E. That conclusion is based on 1996 research that carbon-dated bones of rats, which are thought to have been brought to New Zealand by humans either as stowaways or for food. But this study has been controversial because there's no evidence of human settlements at that time. Some critics have suggested that the carbon dates were due to a lab error in preparing the bones.

To help clear up the confusion, a team led by Janet Wilmshurst, a paleoecologist at environmental research organization Landcare Research in Lincoln, New Zealand, used a different preparation technique that is thought to be more accurate. The researchers obtained 17 bones from the two excavation sites where the oldest rat remains had been found. Carbon-dating with the improved method indicated that the new bones were from 1280 or later. When the researchers tried the new technique on some of the bones from the previous study, all of them dated to later than 1280, indicating that the earlier research was flawed.

The researchers next carbon-dated ancient seeds that the rats had gnawed and that came from one of the excavation sites. The results gave a date of 1290 or later, confirming that humans did not arrive until 1280 at the earliest, the researchers report in the 3 June issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Ian Smith, an anthropologist at the University of Otago in New Zealand, says the finding "provides convincing evidence against the assertion that either rats or people reached New Zealand prior to the 13th century A.D." He adds that the later arrival indicates that humans' devastating impact on New Zealand, which has included deforestation and the extinction of birds and marine mammals, happened in only 600 years, versus more than 2000 years if the initial bone dating had been confirmed.

David Lowe, a soil scientist at the University of Waikato in Hamilton, New Zealand, says the findings also indicate that "the destruction caused by the rats in New Zealand has been pronounced and very fast indeed." The rats wiped out several species, including some birds and frogs. Wilmshurst adds that the speed of destruction "makes the risk to currently declining populations of rat-sensitive species more pressing as they could be diminishing faster than previously assumed."
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 04:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部