ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2373|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

670-650-600 继续战斗|这是一个分享GMAT学习心得的日记贴

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-3-12 00:02:53 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
我有一个贴介绍过自己的背景,其实感觉基础没有问题,因为长期在美帝工作,男盆友又是native speaker,我做题基本没有不认识的词,长难句也不是问题。看Manhattan的语法书什么的都是英文反而比较看的懂。但考完第二次以后砸了两万块上ZB的一对一结果考出600分也是让我质疑了人生很久(人生做的最蠢的决定没有之一)。

消沉加freak out了很久之后,现在又振作起来要考第四次了。这期间还换了次工作。

四月20号考试。
在学习的过程中会有些思考和收获,想发到这里来和大家交流下。

昨天把RC的题目总结完了,刚才在看scientific american休息一下,然后就开始想我要是gmac会怎么出题。自己出了几道,大家复习累了也可以来试着自己出题玩一下当休息了。文章我已经按G爸爸的思路调整过了。注意超链接我没去掉。编了一个正确答案一个陷阱答案。
Dentalerosion is one of the most common tooth problems in the world today. Fizzydrinks, fruit juice, wine, and other acidic food and drink areusually to blame, although perhaps surprisingly the way we clean our teeth also plays a role. This all makes it soundlike a rather modern issue. But research suggests actually humans have beensuffering dental erosion for millions of years. Recently, researchers havediscovered dental lesions remarkably similar to those caused by modern erosionon two 2.5m year-old front teeth from one of our extinct ancestors. This adds to theevidence that prehistoric humans and their predecessors suffered surprisinglysimilar dental problems to ourselves, despite our very different diets. Thereason may be another unlikely parallel. Erosive wear today is often alsoassociated with aggressive tooth brushing. Australopithecus africanus probably experiencedsimilar dental abrasion from eating tough and fibrous foods. For lesions toform, they would still have needed a diet high in acidic foods. Instead offizzy drinks, this probably came in the form of citrus fruits and acidicvegetables. For example, tubers (potatoes and the like) are tough to eat andsome can be surprisingly acidic, so they could have been a cause of thelesions.
Dentalerosion is extremely rare in the fossil record, although this might be becauseresearchers haven’t thought to look for evidence of it until now. But anothertype of problem, carious lesions or cavities, has been found more often infossilised teeth. Cavities are the most common cause of toothache today and arecaused by consuming starchy or sugary food and drink including grains. Theyare often considered a relatively modernproblem linked to the fact that the invention of farming introduced largeamounts of carbohydrates, and more recently refined sugar, to our diets.
Butrecent research suggests that cavities have now been found in tooth fossilsfrom nearly every prehistoric hominin species studied. They were probablycaused by eating certain fruits and vegetation as well as honey. These lesionswere often severe, as in the case of cavities found on the teeth of the newly discovered species, Homo naledi. Infact, these cavities were so deep they probably took yearsto form and would almost certainly have caused serious toothache.

Q1 What isthe function of the example of tubers in the first paragraph?
A To pointout a type of fruit that is acidic
B To mentiona possible cause that might have led to lesions

Q2 It can beinferred from the passage that compared to carious lesions, Dentalerosion,
A rarelyexists in tooth fossils
B is supportedby less evidence

Q 3according to the recent research, cavities are related to
A modern farming
B certainfruits and vegetation




收藏收藏2 收藏收藏2
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-12 21:00:58 | 只看该作者
自己出题的时候真的就能体会到出题的人心机有多重,陷阱是怎么设计出来的了。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-13 16:38:19 | 只看该作者
今天看了几篇gmatclub还有beat the gmat上的debrief,发现不同的人的学习方法真的太不一样了。具体方法应该根据自己情况制定。

我觉得自己的情况分两种,Quant 和CR是属于重拾记忆型,我的思维已经有了,只需要熟悉题型,记住公式、逻辑关系,在考场上只要能读懂题我就能做对。所以不需要花时间去读CR bible之类的建立基础的书籍,把OG题做掉就好了。

RC和SC是属于能力建设型。首先非母语者对于语言的敏感度不够高,比如读到awkward language不敏感,这个应该可以通过重复的刷OG正确句子建立敏感度(大概和学数学的题海战术类似)。大家都说题目不在多在精,我觉得RC是一个需要刷题量的section。阅读量一定要够才能保证阅读的能力,题目要做的够才能保证理解和解体的能力。所以我先把OG题目套路整理了一下,然后做一段时间新题,再刷OG的题,希望能够建立一种解体的intuition,同时提升阅读能力。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-13 16:44:19 | 只看该作者
今天还有一个感慨就是,在职复习不一定是一件坏事,我发现当自己工作很忙的时候,复习效率反而会高,因为觉得只有几个小时很珍贵所以复习的时候特别专注,而不忙的时候反而会有些松散。还有就是我觉得如果自己不工作也是做不到一天8小时的全职复习的,可能年纪大了精力不行。。。所以现在每天能复习的时长还是比较适当(3-5个小时)。唯一不好的就是要出差的时候就没法保证时间了。
5#
发表于 2018-3-14 09:51:18 | 只看该作者
好有心啊
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-14 12:47:18 | 只看该作者
因为需要买question bank今天试做了三个美国的考试的辅导机构的free trial的RC, egmat, gmat pill还有veritas。

veritas题目是全部免费,感觉基本是未经压缩的SA那一类文章,只做到了长文章,很长,题目全部都是inference的题,据说文章类型也很单一。

egamt题目有长有短,类型也丰富,但是文章写的和OG差距太大了,感觉像在读NPR news。决定放弃。

GMAT pill做完两篇惊呼和OG太像了,正准备要买,发现原来题目是prep12里面的!(google解释的时候发现的)。差点入坑。

也看了一下其它像magoosh、economist这些,都是题目和课程捆着买。我估计他们的题目都和官方差距太大了,所以重点只能卖课程。

结论就是还是乖乖去刷官方题吧。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-14 12:47:57 | 只看该作者
说小安阅读是XDF的题,不知道大家做完的感觉怎么样?
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-15 12:28:27 | 只看该作者
发现magoosh有两个解析限定性修饰和非限定性修饰,还有touching rule的文章,讲的很清楚。
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-grammar-vital-noun-modifiers/
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/that-vs-which-on-the-gmat/
还有egamt这篇也很好
https://gmatclub.com/forum/noun-modifiers-can-modify-slightly-far-away-noun-135868.html

take away
vital从句后面跟which引导的非限定性从句在GMAT里面是正确的,修饰对象需要看语义。怎么判断是不是vital就看移除从句后是否是去要表达的意思,或者能否把从句换一个位置。
The meal at the resturant, which  was delicious, cost me $100. 显然which修饰的是meal因为resturant不能delicous
但如果出现modifier直接修饰主语,那么>上述情况



9#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-15 15:50:16 | 只看该作者
720. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.

一开始在想Ron不是说所有,verbing都是adv modifier不能修饰名词吗,为什么这题会对。然后发现这里是一对逗号,which makes it a noun modifier插入语。
10#
发表于 2018-3-16 05:29:18 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-7 03:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部