- UID
- 1337052
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2018-4-7
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
546.With employer-paid training, workers have the potential to become more productive not only in their present employment but also in any number of jobs with different employers. To increase the productivity of their workforce, many firms are planning to maintain or even increase their investments in worker training. But some training experts object that if a trained worker is hired away by another firm, the employer that paid for the training has merely subsidized a competitor. They note that such hiring has been on the rise in recent years.
Which of the following would, if true, contribute most to defeating the training experts` objection to the firms` strategy?
- AFirms that promise opportunities for advancement to their employees get, on average, somewhat larger numbers of job applications from untrained workers than do firms that make no such promise. 分析该选项
- BIn many industries, employees who take continuing-education courses are more competitive in the job market. 分析该选项
- CMore and more educational and training institutions are offering reduced tuition fees to firms that subsidize worker training. 分析该选项
- DResearch shows that workers whose training is wholly or partially subsidized by their employer tend to get at least as much training as do workers who pay for all their own training. 分析该选项
- EFor most firms that invest in training their employees, the value added by that investment in employees who stay exceeds the value lost through other employees` leaving to work for other companies. 分析该选项
- D的解释看不太明白
- 附上OG解释
- The more highly trained workers-regardeless of whether their training was company subsidized or not-would presumably be prime targets for recruitment by competing firms,just as the experts warned.从D选项中如何看出这层逻辑关系啊
- 求牛牛解释
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2018-11-6 16:14:36
收藏
收藏
