- UID
- 1301307
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2017-8-31
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
求解释这个OG阅读,蓝色highlight的部分。我不太理解,明明说的是the alternative to constructism, 怎么又代表constructism 的意见了?
Jon Clark’s study of the effect of the modernization
of a telephone exchange on exchange maintenance
work and workers is a solid contribution to a debate
that encompasses two lively issues in the history and
sociology of technology: technological determinism
and social constructivism.
Clark makes the point that the characteristics of a
technology have a decisive influence on job skills and
work organization. Put more strongly, technology can
be a primary determinant of social and managerial
organization. Clark believes this possibility has
been obscured by the recent sociological fashion,
exemplified by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes
the way machinery reflects social choices. For
Braverman, the shape of a technological system is
subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control
of the labor process from the workers. Technological
change is construed as the outcome of negotiations
among interested parties who seek to incorporate
their own interests into the design and configuration
of the machinery. This position represents the new
mainstream called social constructivism.
The constructivists gain acceptance by
misrepresenting technological determinism:
technological determinists are supposed to believe,
for example, that machinery imposes appropriate
forms of order on society. The alternative to
constructivism, in other words, is to view technology
as existing outside society, capable of directly
influencing skills and work organization.
Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists
by both theoretical and empirical arguments.
Theoretically he defines “technology” in terms of
relationships between social and technical variables.
Attempts to reduce the meaning of technology to
cold, hard metal are bound to fail, for machinery is
just scrap unless it is organized functionally and
supported by appropriate systems of operation and
maintenance. At the empirical level Clark shows how
a change at the telephone exchange from
maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches
to semielectronic switching systems altered work
tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration,
and organization of workers. Some changes Clark
attributes to the particular way management and
labor unions negotiated the introduction of the
technology, whereas others are seen as arising from
the capabilities and nature of the technology itself.
Thus Clark helps answer the question: “When is
social choice decisive and when are the concrete
characteristics of technology more important?”
4. (Book Question: 520)
The information in the passage suggests that which of the following statements from hypothetical sociological studies of change in industry most clearly exemplifies the social constructivists’ version of technological determinism?
A. It is the available technology that determines workers’ skills, rather than workers’ skills influencing the application of technology.
B. All progress in industrial technology grows out of a continuing negotiation between technological possibility and human need.
C. Some organizational change is caused by people; some is caused by computer chips.
D. Most major technological advances in industry have been generated through research and development.
E. Some industrial technology eliminates jobs, but educated workers can create whole new skills areas by the adaptation of the technology.
Correct Answer: A
Selected Answer: C
Application
This question requires understanding different points of view discussed in the passage. In the first paragraph, the passage mentions the debate involving technological determinism and social constructivism. In the second and third paragraphs, the passage uses Braverman’s analysis to illustrate the social constructivists’ position and in the third paragraph suggests that the constructivists are misrepresenting technological determinism (line 24). In lines 29–30, the constructivists are reported to hold that technological determinism views technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization.
A Correct. This statement is consistent with the constructivists’ view that technological determinism sees technology as outside of society, influencing workers’ skills.
B The passage states that the constructivists hold that technological determinists are supposed to believe . . . that machinery imposes appropriate forms of order on society (lines 25–27), suggesting that no negotiation is present.
C According to the description of them in the passage, constructivists portray technological determinists as believing that technology, not people, drives organizational change.
D The passage does not portray either constructivists or determinists as being concerned with technological research and development.
E The passage does not portray either constructivists or determinists as being concerned with technology-driven job elimination or creation.
|
|