求助～～！两道相似的PREP逻辑题

Eleanorrr · 发表于 2018-2-5 20:03:31

这是第一个！！

In order to improve the long-term savings rate of its citizens, Levaska’s government has decided to introduce special savings accounts. Citizens can save up to $3,000 a year in special accounts without having to pay tax on the interest, unless they withdraw money from the account before they reach the age of sixty-five. If they do withdraw any money before that age, they have to pay tax on the accumulated interest and a penalty.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously threatens the success of the government’s plan?

A

The banks and financial institutions where the special accounts will be held lobbied hard for their introduction.
B

Nearly all workers in Levaska can already save money in tax-free accounts through their workplace.
C

For the past ten years, Levaskans have been depositing an ever smaller percentage of their income in long-term savings.
D

Many Levaskans continue to work beyond the age of sixty-five.
E
In certain circumstances, such as a serious illness, the government plans to waive the penalty on early withdrawals from the special accounts.

答案选：B
这是第二个：

Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
- A
  
  A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
- B
  
  Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
- C
  
  The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
- D
  
  Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
- E
  
  Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
  答案选：D
  问题是这两道题题干和问法都一样：
  逻辑链：政府需要提高储蓄率-->设置免税的特殊账户要求工人存款，否则纳税作为惩罚-->政府的措施有效（CONCLUSION）
  削弱则：
  CQ1:方案的可行性-->题目1:几乎所有工人都有了免税账户则特殊账户实施也没用
  -->题目2:很多人会把钱从一个账户转到另一个账户
  CQ2:方案的可操作性
  CQ3:方案的否定副作用
  
  我认为两个答案都有道理，但是题目2中的B选项说的是：工人已经有了账户所以不会用特殊账户，这不是和题目1的答案类似吗？？为什么选D呢？？
  期待大神解答！！

[Helr题库] 求助～～！两道相似的PREP逻辑题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()