ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2973|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解pack2一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-11-25 22:06:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Since smoking-related illnesses are a serious health problem in Normark, and since addiction to nicotine prevents many people from quitting smoking, the Normakian government plans to reduce the maximum quantity of nicotine per cigarette by half over the next five years. However, reducing the quantity of nicotine per cigarette will probably cause people addicted to nicotine to smoke more cigarettes. Therefore,implementing this plan is unlikely to reduce the incidence of smoking-relatedillness.
•Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument about the consequences of implementing the Nomarkian government’s plan?
•A Over half of the nonsmoking adults in Normark have smoked cigarettes in the past.
•B Most cigarettes currently sold in Normark contain somewhat less than the maximum amount of nicotine permitted by law.
•C Inexpensive, smoke-free sources of nicotine, such as nicotine gum and nicotine skin patches, have recently become available in Normark.
•D Many Normarkian smoker already spend a large proportion of their disposable income on cigarettes.
•E The main cause of smoking-related illness is not nicotine but the tar in cigarette smoke.


求问b为什么错了?
如果,现在的尼古丁含量少于法定最大值,烟民对尼古丁又上瘾,那么政府越减越少,烟民越抽越多。不就削弱了政府政策,支持了argument吗?

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-11-26 08:28:38 | 只看该作者
结论:(Therefore) 这个计划不可能减少和吸烟有关的疾病发生率

题目问的是argument about the consequences

consequences → illness

B没有explicitly刻画出和疾病的关系,而E有,选相对好的
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-11-26 13:11:52 | 只看该作者
你是认真的吗 发表于 2017-11-26 08:28
结论:(Therefore) 这个计划不可能减少和吸烟有关的疾病发生率

题目问的是argument about the consequence ...

谢谢
地板
发表于 2019-12-23 22:24:49 | 只看该作者
conclusion: 减少烟中nicotine的含量,不能减少跟吸烟有关疾病的发生率
问 支持
这道题告诉我们 找对结论很重要
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-17 12:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部