请教各位NN一道逻辑题~

fifiwong · 发表于 2012-12-22 17:23:34

Verbal分册 46. A study of marital relationships in which one partner's sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of the other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments than do couples in a relationship in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns. Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) Married couples in which both spouses follow the same sleeping and waking patterns also occasionally have arguments than can jeopardize the couple's marriage.
(B) The sleeping and waking cycles of individuals tend to vary from season to season.
(C) The individuals who have sleeping and waking cycles that differ significantly from those of their spouses tend to argue little with colleagues at work.
(D) People in unhappy marriages have been found to express hostility by adopting a different sleeping and waking cycle from that of their spouses.
(E) According to a recent study, most people's sleeping and waking cycles can be controlled and modified easily
D选项可以理解，但实在不明白为什么A不对，看了别的帖子觉得那些解释都不太能彻底明确的指出A的问题啊~如果有同样作息时间的夫妇也会吵架也会危害到婚姻，这不是削弱了原文的结论“作息时间不相同严重危害婚姻”么？
求各位NN解答~感激不尽~

fifiwong · 发表于 2012-12-22 17:24:00

自己顶一个~

joyzhang1990 · 发表于 2012-12-22 18:17:16

偶不是NN哈~A我觉得是有occasionally，就是削弱的不够彻底。文中是因为作息时间不同，所以unhappy marriage。D是因为unhappy marriage，所以故意要作息时间不同。直接认为文中的因果颠倒。削弱的更彻底。呵呵。自己的看法~仅供参考

呼叫大牛~

fifiwong · 发表于 2012-12-23 12:01:06

谢谢哈~有看到别的帖子指出occasionally的问题，就是觉得似乎也不是十分明确是不是单靠这个就应该排除A，当然A跟D比起来是D更彻底

Patrickkk · 发表于 2016-9-14 22:09:28

A does not contradict with the conclusion. The conclusion is "Mismatched s&w can seriously jeopardize" and A is "occasionally jeopardize"

大橘子 · 发表于 2017-4-25 18:57:40

我是觉得stimulus里面提到一句：xxx have more violent arguments than xxx，因此same pattern的spouse也会吵架，只不过是次数没有那么多，因此是occasionally。

[逻辑小分队] 请教各位NN一道逻辑题~

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()