ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Letter to the editor: Our city plans to allow major commercial development along the south waterfront and, in so doing, to increase its tax revenue.

But, to succeed commercially, the development would inevitably create far more road traffic than the existing roads to the waterfront can handle, causing serious congestion. Providing enough roads or public transportation to the area would cost far more than the city could gain from the increased tax revenue.

Which of the following, if added to the city's plan, would be most likely to help solve the problem the letter describes?


正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 6761|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[prep2012公路收费问题求NN解释]学经济的想多了无法理解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-8 23:26:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Letter to the editor: Our city plans to allow major commercial development along the south waterfront and, in so doing, to increase its tax revenue.
But, to succeed commercially, the development would inevitably create far more road traffic than the existing roads to the waterfront can handle, causing serious congestion. Providing enough roads or public transportation to the area would cost far more than the city could gain from the increased tax revenue.

Which of the following, if added to the city's plan, would be most likely to help solve the problem the letter describes?
A. Funding construction of new roads to the waterfront with a system of tolls on the new roads to the waterfront
B. Allowing residential development along the waterfront so that there will be waterfront residents who can walk to the commercial development
C. Giving tax breaks to developers of businesses along the waterfront to offset any tax levied on them for construction of roads or public transportation
D. Evaluating the net benefits that the commercial development would bring to the city in terms of improved quality of life for the city's residents rather than in financial terms
E. Allowing commercial development in other city neighborhoods whose roads are not seriously congested with traffic

我选C的理由: tax break的确会使得revenue减少 但是Break之后会恢复啊 那时候就有revenue了啊

对答案A的怀疑: 你在路上设roll就没人去了啊  那你还commercial succeed个啥呢  

我的分析: 政府的问题是入不敷出,那要么提高入,要么减少出
A选项是提高入,我选的C是减少出


求NN解释
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-8 23:35:25 | 只看该作者
人工D
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-9 00:06:02 | 只看该作者
DDDDDD
地板
发表于 2012-11-9 07:49:20 | 只看该作者
这题这么明显楼主一定是题目没读全吧。
政府想要繁荣提高税收,但是又不想花钱修路,那么就修路后收费咯?这跟咱们国家的思想保持一致撒。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-9 09:55:39 | 只看该作者
Giving tax breaks to developers of businesses along the waterfront to offset any tax levied on them for construction of roads or public transportation

这句话的意思是路是政府修?不是商家修?
6#
发表于 2012-11-9 11:03:29 | 只看该作者
我没有做过OG13,第一次看见这个题,试着分析用一下~~

文章:
城市计划引进商业发展 在SW地方,以此可以增加城市的税收收入。但是,这样会增加SW地区的佳通拥堵,如果缓解交通拥堵,就必须增加税收的使用(减少税收)
题目要求解决这个problem。

这是一个paradox题目,好的解决方案能使两个方面目的都达到:增加税收收入,且缓解交通拥堵状况。

答案A:对新建的道路系统收费。
这是一个perfect的答案:首先,是缓解了交通拥堵,因为 construction of new roads;其次,toll可以避免或者说弥补因为修路而减少的财政收入,从而使得税收收入不会花费在修路上

C选项不好:给SW地区经济建设者一个征税break,以抵消把他们的征税花费在道路建设上。
这只能加重paradox:因为政府的税收收入并不会因此而增加,甚至可能减少。虽然可能会因此而增加更多的developer到SW地区

Paradox题目的解决方案肯定是有两方面作用的,只解决单方面的问题是不对的
另外,CR题目的答案应该选择最优的,不要结合常识。

(就算结合常识的话,这道题A肯定也是最可行的。不知道LZ有没有学过经济技术合作课程?现在通常的国家基础性项目建设一般都是承包给企业施工,然后允许他们收费以抵消成本,再回收政府提供给公民免费使用,因为公共项目都具有外部性嘛~~这里扯多了,LZ可以忽略括号内的内容)
7#
发表于 2016-5-31 12:40:04 | 只看该作者
12711399 发表于 2012-11-9 07:49
这题这么明显楼主一定是题目没读全吧。政府想要繁荣提高税收,但是又不想花钱修路,那么就修路后收费咯?这 ...

哈哈哈笑死了
8#
发表于 2017-2-28 13:12:17 | 只看该作者
再次读题后突然冒出一个idea,即:题中的paradox实际上是针对建设完工当年的gain和loss的情况。也就是说商业区建好当年的tax revenue小于了建桥的cost,政府的预算要出现大赤字,问怎么办。楼主提到的C中revenue先减少然后恢复的逻辑是说不通的,因为照此逻辑,建桥的cost一定会被若干年加总的tax revenue弥补掉。
照此思路,最好的增加当年的revenue的办法就是收过路费,因为减少建桥cost的方案没有在选项中出现(比如发包给中国施工方啊!!just kidding)。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 04:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部