ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 947|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道逻辑题求问

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-9-29 12:24:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
[size=10.000000pt]More and more companies have begun to consume less energy by making themselves more efficient. Over time,these efforts could place the United States at the forefront of an emerging global market for cleaner technologies.Such efforts are also essential to tackling the two big energy-related issues of the age: global warming and thedependence on precarious supplies of oil. The federal government should encourage these efforts by providing thenecessary incentives, whether as loans, direct grants or targeted tax breaks. Which of the following, if true,provides the most effective support for the argument?
                                       


    A On the average, Canadian companies are more energy efficient than those in the United States.

    B Experts believe that energy efficiency could lower the energy use of the United States to the level of 1995.

    C In the past, government incentives have made advances in energy conservation feasible, especially in the auto industry.(答案)

    D The dependence on foreign oil is a greater problem in the present than global warming.

    E The market for cleaner technologies is currently relatively small because of the infrastructure requirements.





    这是GMATCLUB的一道题,LZ想问一下,“因为in the past可行,所以now可行”这种逻辑是正确的吗?
  • 有无OG中的例子?
                                
                        
               

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-9-29 16:58:34 | 只看该作者
其他的豆无关
C是想说这些激励是过有效的 不是无效的
  因此support采用A会导致B
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-16 02:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部