ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1444|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求NN解答 intent的用法 GWD两道SC存在矛盾~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-5 01:17:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
(1)GWD-25-Q20
Most states impose limitations on the authority of the legislature to borrow money, with their objectives being to protect taxpayers and the credit of the state government.

A.to borrow money, with their objectives being to protect.

B.to borrow money, the objectives of which are the protecting of

C.to borrow money, limitations intended to protect.

D.for borrowing money, of which the objective is protecting.

E.for borrowing money, limitations with the intent of protecting.

正确答案是:C intent to do
GWD SC解析中说E不对是因为 intent of protecting

Q26: PP56.

The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seed up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.



A.passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.


B.the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell


C.the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling


D.the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

E.the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

正确答案:C
此时又可以有intent of 的说法?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-5-23 17:13:12 | 只看该作者
1,"With the intention of" can only describe people and/or other entities that can legitimately have "intentions" (corporations, governments, etc.)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-28 14:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部