ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2456|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CR求解 source:gmatclub 700-level questions

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-3-26 11:05:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Minorities were five times as likely as non-minorities to be stopped by the police in 1992. Once stopped, however, they were no more likely to actually be arrested. The police have compounded the problem by loading information on these people into its permanent database, which is one of the first stops for investigating actual crimes. Innocent individuals become a permanent focus of the police because of their ethnic background.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly undermines the argument above?

(a)        Policed stopped nine times more total people in 1992 than in previous years.
(b)        Innocent people listed on the database are highly unlikely to be arrested for actual crimes.
(c)        The database has been instrumental in the capture of several important criminals.
(d)        The minority population is much larger than the non-minority population.
(e)        Not everyone stopped by police is entered into the database.

OA是d 然后我并不知道d有什么关系?? 麻烦大神指导
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-3-26 12:10:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
板凳
发表于 2016-3-26 12:18:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-26 23:47:04 | 只看该作者


你的无关选项排除和因果关系很好~至少我懂了
我看了下gmatclub上面的解释 说d的可能情况是
majority 1 60
minority 1 40
minority 2 40
总之这题出的不太好就是了
5#
发表于 2016-3-27 00:53:24 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
6#
发表于 2016-3-27 01:00:37 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-27 01:35:51 | 只看该作者

btw thx~~~
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-27 01:46:25 | 只看该作者
elusive 发表于 2016-3-27 01:00
如果不用相关做,
因果推理:
因为少数民族,虽然是无辜的,更容易被调查

我现在的理解是
果 :比起非少数民族 少数民族5倍可能被警察怀疑
因:他们的民族背景
要削弱 它因  少数民族本来就比非少数民族多
9#
发表于 2016-3-27 01:59:11 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
10#
发表于 2016-3-28 22:06:25 | 只看该作者
midsummer1026 发表于 2016-3-27 01:46
我现在的理解是
果 :比起非少数民族 少数民族5倍可能被警察怀疑
因:他们的民族背景

这个理解是错的。因为结论是Innocent individuals become a permanent focus of the police because of their ethnic background,而不是Minorities were five times as likely as non-minorities to be stopped by the police in 1992。
所以这一定不可能是一个果因推理。

这题其实是一个统计枚举题。
说Innocent individuals become a permanent focus of the police because of their ethnic background的唯一论结就是Minorities were five times as likely as non-minorities to be stopped by the police in 1992。这本身是一个“数据类”的论据。既然是数据类的,我只要证明data is bias的就可以了:如果本来Minorities在当地就是多数人口呢?那按照概率来说他们被拦下检查的“次数”比Majorities多也不奇怪啊。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 05:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部