Kitchen magazine plans to license the use of itsname by a line of cookware. For amagazine, licensing the use of its name for products involves some danger,since if the products disappoint consumers, the magazine's reputation suffers,with consequent reductions in circulation and advertising. However, experts have evaluated the cookwareand found it superior to all other cookware advertised in Kitchen. Therefore, Kitchen can collect its licensingfee without endangering its other revenues. The argument above assumes which of the following? A. No other line of cookware is superior to that which will carry theKitchen name. B. Kitchen will not license the use of its namefor any products other than the line of cookware. C. Makers of cookware willnot find Kitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine'sname is associated with a competing product. D. Consumers who are not regular readers ofKitchen magazine will be attracted to the cookware by the Kitchen name. E. Kitchen is one of the most prestigiouscooking-related magazines.
答案就是c
prep给的解析是:其他的厨具制造商会认为Kitchen杂志是一个没什么吸引力的杂志因为这个杂志的名字被和竞争对手的品牌联系在了一起。该选项直接涉及到了因果之间的联系问题。也就是说,就算有“因”,结论中的“果”也不一定可以达成。因为Kitchen其他的收入肯定是包括广告费的。属于CQ1:因果概括问题。
我怎么觉得解析里的翻译不对啊?原句不是说will not find kitchen 是一个没什么吸引力的杂志?!!
|