ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1917|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-3-9,大全-3-10-->携隐修改标题(大全-3-9,10)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-16 18:45:00 | 只看该作者

大全-3-9,大全-3-10-->携隐修改标题(大全-3-9,10)

Questions 9-10 are based on the following.


In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these occupations slipped in pay and status when they became largely occupied by women. Therefore, if women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting, law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.


9.     The argument above is based on


(A) another argument that contains circular reasoning


(B) an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case


(C) an analogy between the past and the future


(D) an appeal to popular beliefs and valuesC


(E) an attack on the character of the opposition


10.   Which of the following, if true, would most likely be part of the evidence used to refute the conclusion above?


(A) Accountants, lawyers, and physicians attained their current relatively high levels of income and prestige at about the same time that the pay and status of teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries slipped.


(B) When large numbers of men join a female-dominated occupation, such as airline flight attendant, the status and pay of the occupation tend to increase.


(C) The demand for teachers and secretaries has increased significantly in recent years, while the demand for bank tellers has remained relatively stable.


(D) If present trends in the awarding of law degrees to women continue, it will be at least two decades before the majority of lawyers are women.E


(E) The pay and status of female accountants, lawyers, and physicians today are governed by significantly different economic and sociological forces than were the pay and status of female teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries in the past.


第九题:the argument above is based on ,从正确答案来看指的是两个小例子分别的论证方法,而不是两个例子整体的论证方法。请问怎么可以看出来它问的是两个小例子分别的论证方法。


第十题:E, in the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these occupations slipped in pay and status when they became largely occupied by women. 这难道不是socialogical forces的一部分吗? 不是在加强吗?



沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-21 11:36:00 | 只看该作者
ding
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-22 15:30:00 | 只看该作者
up
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-25 11:30:00 | 只看该作者
up
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-26 10:40:00 | 只看该作者
up
6#
发表于 2005-7-26 14:17:00 | 只看该作者

In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these occupations slipped in pay and status when they became largely occupied by women. Therefore, if women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting, law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.


第九题:


问法说明此题是论证方法题,问的是整个论证过程的方法。


题中举例以前的情况是为了支持其结论:Therefore, if women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting, law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.所以,用的是类比。


第十题:


这难道不是socialogical forces的一部分吗?


题中没有说这是socialogical forces的一部分,千万不要自己假设;即便是,注意E的说法:are governed by significantly different economic and sociological forces than were the pay and status of female ,这足以对原文的类比推理形成驳斥。


7#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-26 18:09:00 | 只看该作者
thanks
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-28 15:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部