ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2927|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 一个短阅读,没人讨论过~ 定位在哪里?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-14 00:53:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
For many years, theoretical economists characterized humans as rational beings relentlessly bent on maximizing purely selfish reward. Results of an experimental economics study appear to contradict this view, however.In the “Ultimatum Game,” two subjects, who cannot exchange information, are placed in separate rooms.One is randomly chosen to propose how a sum of money, known to both, should be shared between them; only one offer, which must be accepted or rejected without negotiation, is allowed.

If, in fact, people are selfish and rational, then the proposer should offer the smallest possible share, while the responder should accept any offer, no matter how small:after all, even one dollar is better than nothing.In numerous trials, however, two-thirds of the offers made were between 40 and 50 percent; only 4 percent were less than 20 percent.Among responders, more than half who were offered less than 20 percent rejected the offer.Behavior in the game did not appreciably depend on the players’ sex, age, or education.Nor did the amount of money involved play a significant role:for instance, in trials of the game that were conducted in Indonesia, the sum to be shared was as much as three times the subjects’ average monthly income, and still responders refused offers that they deemed too small.

Q7:

The passage implies that the results of the Ultimatum Game undermine theoretical economists’ characterization of human beings by


A.demonstrating that most people are inclined to try to maximize their own advantage whenever possible[XF]

B.indicating that people who do not have the option of negotiating might behave more generously than do those who have the option of negotiating [ND]

C.illustrating how people’s economic behavior depends to some extent on how large a sum of money is involved[ND]

D.showing that most people instinctively place their own economic self-interest ahead of the interest of strangers[ND]

E.suggesting that people’s economic behavior might in part be motivated by factors other than selfishness

用排除法可以看出可能的选项是E,可是既然是推导题,一定有定位!请问定位在文章的哪里???
叩谢~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-10-14 19:29:27 | 只看该作者
For many years, theoretical economists characterized humans as rational beings relentlessly bent on maximizing purely selfish reward. Results of an experimental economics study appear to contradict this view, however.In the “Ultimatum Game,” two subjects, who cannot exchange information, are placed in separate rooms.One is randomly chosen to propose how a sum of money, known to both, should be shared between them; only one offer, which must be accepted or rejected without negotiation, is allowed.

If, in fact, people are selfish and rational, then the proposer should offer the smallest possible share, while the responder should accept any offer, no matter how small:after all, even one dollar is better than nothing.In numerous trials, however, two-thirds of the offers made were between 40 and 50 percent; only 4 percent were less than 20 percent.Among responders, more than half who were offered less than 20 percent rejected the offer.Behavior in the game did not appreciably depend on the players’ sex, age, or education.Nor did the amount of money involved play a significant role:for instance, in trials of the game that were conducted in Indonesia, the sum to be shared was as much as three times the subjects’ average monthly income, and still responders refused offers that they deemed too small.

Q7:

The passage implies that the results of the Ultimatum Game undermine theoretical economists’ characterization of human beings by


A.demonstrating that most people are inclined to try to maximize their own advantage whenever possible[XF]

B.indicating that people who do not have the option of negotiating might behave more generously than do those who have the option of negotiating [ND]

C.illustrating how people’s economic behavior depends to some extent on how large a sum of money is involved[ND]

D.showing that most people instinctively place their own economic self-interest ahead of the interest of strangers[ND]

E.suggesting that people’s economic behavior might in part be motivated by factors other than selfishness

用排除法可以看出可能的选项是E,可是既然是推导题,一定有定位!请问定位在文章的哪里???
叩谢~
-- by 会员 ykelly123 (2011/10/14 0:53:46)



If, in fact, people are selfish and rational, then the proposer should offer the smallest possible share, while the responder should accept any offer, no matter how small:after all, even one dollar is better than nothing.In numerous trials, however,
板凳
发表于 2012-3-17 20:04:05 | 只看该作者
一语点醒梦中人!啊
地板
发表于 2014-5-16 21:03:57 | 只看该作者
a 为什么不对呀~跪求nn解释
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 07:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部