ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1630|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助。对一个逻辑题的解释有点糊涂

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-16 05:16:00 | 只看该作者

求助。对一个逻辑题的解释有点糊涂

15.


The cost of producing radios in Country Q is ten percent less than the cost of producing radios in Country Y. even after transportation fees and tariff charges are added, it is still cheaper for a company to import radios from Country Q to Country Y than to produce radios in Country Y.



The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?



A. labor costs in Country Q are ten percent below those in Country Y.


B. importing radios from Country Q to Country Y will eliminate ten percent of the manufacturing jobs in Country Y.


C. the tariff on a radio imported from Country Q to Country Y is less than ten percent of the cost of


manufacturing the radio in Country Y.


D. the fee for transporting a radio from Country Q to Country Y is more than ten percent of the cost of manufacturing the radio in Country Q.


E. it takes ten percent less time to manufacture a radios in Country Q than it does in Country Y.



15.


If the tariff on importing radios from Country Q to Country Y were as high as ten percent or more of the cost of producing radios in Y, then, contrary to what the passage says, the cost of importing radios from Q to Y would be equal to or more than the cost of producing radios in Y. thus, the tariff cannot be that high, and C is the best answer.



A and E give possible partial explanations for the cost difference, but neither is supported by the passage because the cost advantage in Q might be attributable to other factors. B and D are both consistent with the information in the passage, but the passage provides no evidence to support them.



说B和D consistent with the information in the passage, but the passage provides no evidence to support them. 什么叫consistent? 和support有什么区别吗? thanks!



沙发
发表于 2005-6-16 05:38:00 | 只看该作者

consistent with应该是与。。。一致的意思。就是不矛盾,但也不互相证明对方


support就有比较强的逻辑关系,可以推理出来结论。


你觉得呢。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-16 06:27:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wanderdream在2005-6-16 5:38:00的发言:

consistent with应该是与。。。一致的意思。就是不矛盾,但也不互相证明对方


support就有比较强的逻辑关系,可以推理出来结论。


你觉得呢。


同意,我刚才觉得自己逻辑上有些糊涂了。因为以前和老板做实验的时候,如果用同一种方法,在不同的背景下,比如测试3次,对同一个subject测试出的结果都是大致相同,那么我们就说这些结果综合起来,支持我们的实验方法,说明它是有效的。consistent就是指几组数据之间相互一致,而support就是说这样的结果,证明了我们方法的可行性。 对吧?


以前经常用这两个词,丈着自己反正是外国人,从来不好好区分,今天第一天开始复习GMAt,碰到了,就糊涂了。问了这个土问题,献丑了。

地板
发表于 2005-6-16 07:43:00 | 只看该作者
我也想文一下这题,当初我选错了,我觉得labor cost, tariff, and transporting fee 都是价格底的原因,为什么选tariff 呢。谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 23:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部