AI016~这篇的文字质量稍微高点。大家帮我看看行不行啊……

1. Architecture of west and east are divergent. The only explanation of the divergence is the distinction of culture, which has great impact on the constructions. For example, in India one can see lots of temples in which Buddha is shrined. On the other hand, in Europe there are numerous cathedrals which are built in honor of Jesus. Different culture and history determines the architectures.

2. Even within a same culture realm, architecture varies with time, because the ideology of a society changes with time. For example, Baroque Style dominated the 17^th century because renaissance was calling for classical elements combined in more complex ways. Some of the later Rococo works contain a richness of ornament, color, and imagery that, combined with a highly sophisticated handling of light.

3. Some constructions reflect the architect’s attitude. Architects merge their thoughts with the building. A case in point is the Sydney Opera House. This building is completely an innovative idea. Another case is the headquarters of HSBC, which is designed by IM Pei. This building stunned the world when it was completed. However, these cases are not universal enough to refute the determinant influence of ideology to architecture.

挺好了，黎明前的黑暗呵呵。

我觉得你可以看看joe11斑斑的签名呵呵

At the brink of despire comes the ultimate hope.
In a journey to the summit of excellence,
May I see you on my side, DreamCatchers?

希望你可以看见他。

哇，小女公子能在building这道题举出这么些例子！

pfpf！

撑住啊！

例子在哪里，在哪里？？

小女比偶的水平高。。。

the passage is from a girl when i search CD,xiaonv,how do you think and you can compare yours with hers:

AI---16  建筑 my practice

    People have different opinions on whether public buildings reveal the attitudes and values of the society that builds them. As far as I am concerned, I believe that most of the public buildings reflect the attitudes and values of the society that builds them, while a few of the public buildings do not. In the following discussions, I would like to reason and provide evidence to support my viewpoint.

    First of all, as an integrating element of a culture, most public buildings do indeed represent the different aesthetic values of respective cultures. For example, the Chinese architecture system and the European one last longest and are the most popular styles among the global architecture systems. On the one hand, using symmetric and square formats, all the Chinese palaces, temples and northern residences reflect the Confucianism and Feudality values; however, using freeform layouts, all the public garden and southern residences reveal the thoughts of Taoism--- returning to the nature. On the other hand, the gardens in Europe were affected by the western philosophy; therefore, they take on a style of beautiful, bright and neat.

    Secondly, the different functions that public buildings serve in different societies directly reflect the attitudes of respective societies at that time. It is another head and chief reason that I chosen to put here. For instance, the Potala Palace in Tibet, China, a structure that deserves a place as one of the wonders eastern architecture, dedicates not only to religious belief but also to the accommodation place---over a thousand Lamas live in it today. Besides, another good example may be found in the case that the proliferation of public cultural centers and schools reflects a societal concerns for the arts and education, respectively, while new prison construction indicates a heightened concern for safety and security.

    Finally, it may be true that not all the public buildings reflect the values and attitudes of the society that builds them. To illustrate, some architects purposely design buildings against the attitudes and values of the society to boost their own fames. However, this argument alone can hardly support the conclusion that public buildings do not reveal the attitudes and values of the society that builds them. In fact, these cases are rare and therefore are too weak to make this conclusion. When the advantages and disadvantages are carefully examined, the most striking conclusion is that most of the public buildings reflect the attitudes and values of the society that builds them.

    To sum up, it is likely that some public buildings do not reveal the attitudes and values of the society that builds them. However, given the reasons discussed above, we can safely arrive at the conclusion that most of the public buildings reflect the attitudes and values of the society that builds them. Nowadays, more and more people share this belief.

?这个不是偶写滴。偶还需要加把劲呢。

小女，加油加油

okmm贴的文章写的不错！！！

但有一点大家需要小心（包括我在内）：

例文中的第四段有点似曾相识，不过这还不是最要紧的；更重要的是有句话说When the advantages and disadvantages are carefully examined... 实际前文中并没有就advantage和disadvantage做对比。我的意思是模板的格式和文章有小冲突，大家用此句时要注意啊。

个人看法，仅供参考！