22. It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the government refuses to support it does not allow, as one can see by rephrasing the statement to read: No one is allowed to create art without a government subsidy.
The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in the argument above?
(A) The claim that any driver who is not arrested does not break the law is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: Every driver who breaks the law gets arrested.
(B) The claim that any driver who is not arrested does mot break the law is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: Every driver who gets arrested has broken the law.
(C) The notion that every scientist who is supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist who is successful is so without a government grant.
(D) The notion that every scientist who is supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist lacking governmental support will be successful.
(E) The notion that every scientist who has been supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist is allowed to do research without a government grant.
16. Essayist: Wisdom and intelligence are desirable qualities. However, being intelligent does not imply that one is wise, nor does being wise imply that one is intelligent. In my own experience, the people I meet have one or the other of these qualities but not both.
If the essayist's statements are true, them each of the following could be true EXCEPT:
(A) Most people are neither intelligent, nor wise.
(B) Most people are both intelligent and wise.
(C) No one is both wise and intelligent.
(D) No one is either wise or intelligent.
(E) Many people are intelligent and yet lack wisdom.
16， read question once more "...except". Choose the wrong not right choice
22,我也有点迷糊。 但是我认为题干没有逻辑错误。一般我的经验是LSAT里没说flawed pattern or reasoning，那么原题干就没有错误。题干就是一般的三段论，不过把次序颠来倒去，还是原命题。A是逆否命题，但除了A别的都有逻辑错误。 另外请大侠分析一下这句话：
(c) the notion that every scientist who is supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: no scientist who is successful is so without a government grant.
no 的作用是否定（scientist who is successful is so without a government grant）还是否定successful，i.e. scientist who is unsuccessful is so without a government support.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2003-11-16 20:40:00
楼主
