ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2360|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道费费逻辑,请指教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-11-8 19:37:00 | 只看该作者

一道费费逻辑,请指教

第112题
Older United States automobiles have been identified as contributing disproportionately to global air pollution. The requirement in many jurisdictions that automobiles pass emission-control inspections has had the effect of taking many such automobiles out of service in the United States, as they fail inspection and their owners opt to buy newer automobiles. Thus the burden of pollution such older United States automobiles contribute to the global atmosphere will be gradually reduced over the next decade.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) It is impossible to separate the air of one country or jurisdiction from that of others. Since air currents circle the globe.
(B) When automobiles that are now new become older, they will, because of a design change, cause less air pollution than older automobiles do now.
(C) The number of jurisdictions in the United States requiring automobiles to pass emission-control inspections is no longer increasing.
(D)  原书上缺漏
(E) Even if all the older automobiles in the United States were retired from service, air pollution from United States automobiles could still increase if the total number of automobiles in use should increase significantly.
    C为什么是削弱呢?我觉得该选A...
沙发
发表于 2003-11-8 21:03:00 | 只看该作者
C的意思是目前的状况下,既然问题依然没有得到解决,那么如果采取措施的州不增加,情况不会改观,结论被削弱。
板凳
发表于 2003-12-27 04:49:00 | 只看该作者
What I understand is :

the assumption between conclusion  (Thus the burden of pollution such older United States automobiles contribute to the global atmosphere will be gradually reduced over the next decade) and premise (The requirement in many jurisdictions that automobiles pass emission-control inspections has had the effect of taking many such automobiles out of service in the United States, as they fail inspection and their owners opt to buy newer automobiles) is that inspection should continue....

the way to weaken the conclusion is to undermine this assumption!

地板
发表于 2004-1-30 18:23:00 | 只看该作者
there is another choice D:

There is a thriving market for used older united states automobiles that are exported to regions that have no emission-control regulations.

I think this makes better sense.
5#
发表于 2004-1-30 22:02:00 | 只看该作者
这个题应该选c,理由如下
题目说的是美国对全球污染的影响,因此说它国的都必须排除,所以a,d该排除
b怎么看都不想weaken,反而使support
e,削弱应该削弱文中的的论据,e中的论据和文中强调的requirement in jurisdictions没关系
c为什么对呢,首先对The requirement in many jurisdictions that automobiles pass emission-control inspections has had the effect of taking many such automobiles out of service in the United States, as they fail inspection and their owners opt to buy newer automobiles.进行weaken, 这时候我的理解是只有jurisdiction逐步increase, older car才会更多的退役,然后才能gradually reduced. c正好是对这个取反,因此c正确
6#
发表于 2004-1-30 22:05:00 | 只看该作者
cranberry也是这个意思,还有问题的第一局是evidence,不能削弱,因此削弱的对象只有下面一句The requirement in many jurisdictions that automobiles pass emission-control inspections。。。。,所以只有跟着个有联系的才能做答案
我也是个新手,请多多指教
7#
发表于 2005-12-1 14:54:00 | 只看该作者

本题标准答案是C,原题中答案C和D对调,因此正确答案为:


C. There is a thriving market for used older united states automobiles that are exported to regions that have no emission-control regulations.
因为这些汽车被卖到别的国家,因此“such older United States automobiles contribute to the global atmosphere will be gradually reduced over the next decade”是错的

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 06:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部