Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-centure American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in sixteenth-century Italy. The considerations givern best serve as part of an argument that A. Mordern audience would find it hard to tolerate certain characteristics of a historically accurate performance of an eighteenth-century play B. Groucho Marx once performed the part of the charater Harlequin in La Finestrina C. In the United States the training of actors in the twentieth centurty is based on principles that do not differ radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy D. the performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim E the director of La Finestrina must have advised the actor who plays Harlequin to model his performance on comic performances of Groucho Marx 归纳题,答案是D... 为什么这么多人看贴都没有人回... 期待大牛能来解释一下~ 我的理解是这戏是在18世纪意大利写的,导演说我们这次要演的非常尊重原著。虽然剧中扮演H的人的表演reminiscent(使人回忆起,很有。。。的艺术风格)美国喜剧大师GM, 但GM的表演风格很接近16世纪的意大利。 D是说扮演H的人的演出并不能作为反驳导演的证据(是这个意思?) 我的疑问是既然都能使人回忆起另外一个演员,且那个演员的风格是16世纪的,难道还不能用来驳斥导演说的?
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/20 22:40:05编辑过] |