ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2090|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]og-54

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-24 10:27:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]og-54

题目的逻辑关系是知道的.可是答案的逻辑关系却怎么也想不清楚.请那位大牛指导一下


og 54


It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nucleear weapons. But if United States companies do not do so, companies in other countries will.


which of the following is most like the argument above in its logical structure?


Answer is D It is true that it is againstt the law to burglarize people's homes. But someone else certernly would have burglarized that house if the defendant had not done so first.





沙发
发表于 2004-8-24 19:47:00 | 只看该作者

原文和D都是这个意思:

做某件事是违法的,但如果被告没这末做,其他人当然会这末做。

板凳
发表于 2005-9-28 21:43:00 | 只看该作者

I know the passage means one's behavior is against the law,and the one excuses that if he or she did not do that others would do that.


And D show the same obviously use "someone esle would....".

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-13 08:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部