求教OG逻辑第5题

Alice25 · 发表于 2011-5-9 19:26:56

A company is considering changing its policy concerning daily working hours. Currently， this company requires all employees to arrive at work at 8 a.m. The proposed policy would permit each employee to decide when to arrivefrom as early as 6 a.m. to as late as 11 a.m.
The adoption of this policy would be most likely to decrease employees’ productivity if the employees’ job functions required them to
(A) work without interruption from other employees
(B) consult at least once a day with employees from other companies
(C) submit their work for a supervisor’s eventual approval
(D) interact frequently with each other throughout the entire workday
(E) undertake projects that take several days to complete
answer

A错在哪呢？

kikisunflower · 发表于 2011-5-9 20:19:21

说下你为什么觉得A对，写下逻辑链

cdwayne · 发表于 2011-5-9 20:33:02

A company is considering changing its policy concerning daily working hours. Currently， this company requires all employees to arrive at work at 8 a.m. The proposed policy would permit each employee to decide when to arrivefrom as early as 6 a.m. to as late as 11 a.m.
The adoption of this policy would be most likely to decrease employees’ productivity if the employees’ job functions required them to
原文表示從原本的8點上工改到雇員自行決定6~11點。問新政策會減低生產力因為

(A) work without interruption from other employees
想成獨立作業，此原因不會使新政策影響生產力

(B) consult at least once a day with employees from other companies
(C) submit their work for a supervisor’s eventual approval
(D) interact frequently with each other throughout the entire workday
工人彼此要時常接觸，那麼上工時間不一致將降低生產力。

(E) undertake projects that take several days to complete
answer

A错在哪呢？

-- by 会员 Alice25 (2011/5/9 19:26:56)

Alice25 · 发表于 2011-5-10 22:48:44

OG上对A的解释是：Working without interruption would likely mean improved productivity.
我的理解是：工作不被打扰就会提高生产力，工作被打扰则会降低生产力，员工频繁的来来去去会打扰其他人，所以也可以符合提干要求吧~？

Remieee · 发表于 2012-8-27 19:59:27

我也这么认为~~求解啊= =

Remieee · 发表于 2012-8-27 19:59:38

A为什么不对啊到底

sawayisa · 发表于 2012-8-28 10:17:44

OG上对A的解释是：Working without interruption would likely mean improved productivity.
我的理解是：工作不被打扰就会提高生产力，工作被打扰则会降低生产力，员工频繁的来来去去会打扰其他人，所以也可以符合提干要求吧~？

-- by 会员 Alice25 (2011/5/10 22:48:44)

员工频繁的来来去去会打扰其他人,这是你自己想出来的consequence,题干中没有这种意思。

xcdamon · 发表于 2016-2-25 12:48:03

这里是方案推理正确D CQ1 从方案的有效性入手。如果大家是group work 需要交流集合的时间不一样  说什么效率

这里我们要注意A 选项 A 选项是我第一眼看到觉得疑似的正确答案，是因为我看题之前其实脑海无意中在想怎么攻击这个方案，就联系实际大早上人进进出出是不是打扰了工作？ OK 好像就是这个意思这种思维感染是无法避免的，别急  继续往下看 BCE 容易排除剩下D 工作需要互相交流 group work 的意思人不到齐怎么玩？是不是也攻击这样会影响效率？。
具体分析道两个选项你会发现其实你脑海里面对于A 多了一个assumption---- interpretation 就是打扰了工作效率。而D 可以直接削弱 因为人没到齐。所以影响效率中间没有任何自己发挥的部分。
此外 OG 认为这个A 是加强否定了一个方案的副作用。算是一种对于D 的方向思考
look  这里就是为什么不选A 的原因  人人都可能有自己的 assumption. 方向不同结果意思也大相径庭  你说该不该选D

AnnieFFish · 发表于 2016-9-14 09:31:55

明白了。。
A确实不直接，要加入自己的想象不过我觉得架桥的方向不是说 interruption会影响工作效率
而是假设了新政策会带来interruption

闭眼看书 · 发表于 2017-7-10 22:15:32

D中require frequent interaction在11点人都到齐之后不是也可以进行吗？重点应该是throughout the entire day? 所以new policy实施之后等于上午就没了？
是这样吗？

求教OG逻辑第5题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()